From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge?

A merge with the Angiotensin II receptor antagonist article may be a good idea. We don't need two separate articles. -- PFHLai ( talk) 15:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply

This article was written as a part of a school project and we weren't allowed to base it on a page that already excisted. I actually think this one is much better than the Angiotensin II receptor antagonist article. But merge is not a bad idea.-- Elinborgus
Yes, it's much, much better. :-) Please see WT:PHARM#University project?. -- PFHLai ( talk) 13:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC) reply


In my opinion it is not critical to merge. It is a very interestring story. By the way, there is a small mistake on the structure of eprosartan. There is no peroxyde group on that molecule. -- Chemistlanglois 3:35, 20 november 2011

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge?

A merge with the Angiotensin II receptor antagonist article may be a good idea. We don't need two separate articles. -- PFHLai ( talk) 15:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply

This article was written as a part of a school project and we weren't allowed to base it on a page that already excisted. I actually think this one is much better than the Angiotensin II receptor antagonist article. But merge is not a bad idea.-- Elinborgus
Yes, it's much, much better. :-) Please see WT:PHARM#University project?. -- PFHLai ( talk) 13:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC) reply


In my opinion it is not critical to merge. It is a very interestring story. By the way, there is a small mistake on the structure of eprosartan. There is no peroxyde group on that molecule. -- Chemistlanglois 3:35, 20 november 2011


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook