![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All sources [1] [2] and [3] for the first section seem to be self published sources. Types of fraud section seems to have many inaccuracies and much original research. Ward20 ( talk) 09:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
I've added a globalise tag.
The article seems quite US focused with the Types of Fraud section being exclusively US; and Notable Cases being 2 US, 1 UK cases.
I think it happens more widely than the US and is capable of being globalised
Icarusgeek ( talk) 17:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Wondering about a broadening of the subject matter to include deception for other gain. Examples that occur to me:
Any thoughts?
Icarusgeek ( talk) 18:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
References
"[C]onservatives insist [disability insurance] is riddled with fraud, despite lots of evidence to the contrary." -Krugman [1]
No idea if Krugman's right or what body of evidence he's talking about. The article would really benefit from a mix of evidence on the prevalence of fraud from both the right and the left... though maintaining NPOV could be a challenge. Here's a mix:
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Disability fraud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Disability fraud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All sources [1] [2] and [3] for the first section seem to be self published sources. Types of fraud section seems to have many inaccuracies and much original research. Ward20 ( talk) 09:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
I've added a globalise tag.
The article seems quite US focused with the Types of Fraud section being exclusively US; and Notable Cases being 2 US, 1 UK cases.
I think it happens more widely than the US and is capable of being globalised
Icarusgeek ( talk) 17:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Wondering about a broadening of the subject matter to include deception for other gain. Examples that occur to me:
Any thoughts?
Icarusgeek ( talk) 18:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
References
"[C]onservatives insist [disability insurance] is riddled with fraud, despite lots of evidence to the contrary." -Krugman [1]
No idea if Krugman's right or what body of evidence he's talking about. The article would really benefit from a mix of evidence on the prevalence of fraud from both the right and the left... though maintaining NPOV could be a challenge. Here's a mix:
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Disability fraud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Disability fraud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)