![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[ [1]] says "By the end of the Second World War there were seventeen MI Sections in the War Office (numbered 1-19 - 13 and 18 do not appear to have been used)." -- Henrygb 10:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Mi18 would be specialized in Prisoner of War debriefing http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:1z5CMURx6EYJ:www.geocities.com/nicodemis_quick/ci/credits_timeline.html+mi13+military+intelligence&hl=fr&gl=fr&ct=clnk&cd=5
and : M13 : Special Reconnaissance Section http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:N76ToandUhgJ:www.airamerica.com/maddow/node/1997+mi18+military+intelligence&hl=fr&gl=fr&ct=clnk&cd=6
When exactly were MI5 and MI6 placed under the Home Office and the Foreign Office? Opera hat 10:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
MI13 may well still be classified, or it may not exist due to plain and simple superstition... i believe that the latter proposition is more likely.
Regardless, the source which suggests the existence of MI20-25 on the guardian web page is just some loon who refers to himself as "Captain S.S DG of MI section 25". I mean seriously?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.62.93 ( talk) 08:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the offending section. Someone blessed with more time on their hands maybe able to provide a better explanation for the missing divisions...
This article needs to explain what MI6 was originally. Sure, it's the foreign intelligence service now, but surely that wasn't the 6th section they formed?! If other sections spied in Russia etc, what was Section 6's original brief? The current article on MI6 says spying in Russia was its forte in WW1, so how does this make sense?-- Jack Upland ( talk) 11:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
The main source of information here seems to be the security establisment, who have no motive to tell the truth and who denied the existence of MI5 and 6 until the end of the Cold War (despite the exposes of Philby etc). Are there any other sources and if not can we put a caveat on the whole thing???-- Jack Upland ( talk) 11:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
The article MI15 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jeepday (
talk)
18:01, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
The article MI16 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jeepday (
talk)
18:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Directorate of Military Intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Directorate of Military Intelligence (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Sections > Name > MI10 > Current Status > “Merged into MI16 after World War II”
Is this a typo? Should this say “Merged into [MI6]after[…]” or is the MI16 designation correct? I am unsure, hence the question here, not an instant correction.
Thanks to anyone skilled enough to let me know whats correct.
sincerely praefectus PraefectusIX ( talk) 14:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[ [1]] says "By the end of the Second World War there were seventeen MI Sections in the War Office (numbered 1-19 - 13 and 18 do not appear to have been used)." -- Henrygb 10:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Mi18 would be specialized in Prisoner of War debriefing http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:1z5CMURx6EYJ:www.geocities.com/nicodemis_quick/ci/credits_timeline.html+mi13+military+intelligence&hl=fr&gl=fr&ct=clnk&cd=5
and : M13 : Special Reconnaissance Section http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:N76ToandUhgJ:www.airamerica.com/maddow/node/1997+mi18+military+intelligence&hl=fr&gl=fr&ct=clnk&cd=6
When exactly were MI5 and MI6 placed under the Home Office and the Foreign Office? Opera hat 10:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
MI13 may well still be classified, or it may not exist due to plain and simple superstition... i believe that the latter proposition is more likely.
Regardless, the source which suggests the existence of MI20-25 on the guardian web page is just some loon who refers to himself as "Captain S.S DG of MI section 25". I mean seriously?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.62.93 ( talk) 08:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the offending section. Someone blessed with more time on their hands maybe able to provide a better explanation for the missing divisions...
This article needs to explain what MI6 was originally. Sure, it's the foreign intelligence service now, but surely that wasn't the 6th section they formed?! If other sections spied in Russia etc, what was Section 6's original brief? The current article on MI6 says spying in Russia was its forte in WW1, so how does this make sense?-- Jack Upland ( talk) 11:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
The main source of information here seems to be the security establisment, who have no motive to tell the truth and who denied the existence of MI5 and 6 until the end of the Cold War (despite the exposes of Philby etc). Are there any other sources and if not can we put a caveat on the whole thing???-- Jack Upland ( talk) 11:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
The article MI15 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jeepday (
talk)
18:01, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
The article MI16 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jeepday (
talk)
18:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Directorate of Military Intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Directorate of Military Intelligence (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Sections > Name > MI10 > Current Status > “Merged into MI16 after World War II”
Is this a typo? Should this say “Merged into [MI6]after[…]” or is the MI16 designation correct? I am unsure, hence the question here, not an instant correction.
Thanks to anyone skilled enough to let me know whats correct.
sincerely praefectus PraefectusIX ( talk) 14:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)