This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Notability
From edit summary, where the notability tag was removed: "Removed notability warning. Catinator, the software is in use by millions of (younger) people worldwide; there's numerous discussion boards and public articles about the products over the last 5 years".
The references you've provided so far don't support this assertion. Can you please provide reliable, third-party, published sources supporting the notability of the company, as described in
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)? Thanks,
Catinator (
talk) 02:56, 21 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Hey it's only 7 years later, & it's the same issue! Do the links to DeskSite pages @ major team sport sites constitute reliable second party documentation? If so, it's a valid, but PR contaminated article. If not, I'm nominating for
for deletion. Regards
Tapered (
talk) 12:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Notability
From edit summary, where the notability tag was removed: "Removed notability warning. Catinator, the software is in use by millions of (younger) people worldwide; there's numerous discussion boards and public articles about the products over the last 5 years".
The references you've provided so far don't support this assertion. Can you please provide reliable, third-party, published sources supporting the notability of the company, as described in
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)? Thanks,
Catinator (
talk) 02:56, 21 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Hey it's only 7 years later, & it's the same issue! Do the links to DeskSite pages @ major team sport sites constitute reliable second party documentation? If so, it's a valid, but PR contaminated article. If not, I'm nominating for
for deletion. Regards
Tapered (
talk) 12:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)reply