The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move as Colorado is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC ( non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Dinosaur Ridge → Dinosaur Ridge (Colorado) – This is a reverted BOLD move with edit summary: "There are three articles with the name dinosaur ridge, so I plan to create a disambiguation." Taewangkorea ( talk) 23:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.  —  Amakuru ( talk) 10:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC) reply

This is a contested technical request ( permalink). ---  Coffeeand crumbs 00:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC) reply

• I queried the original request: Dinosaur Ridge (Alberta) is a painfully brief stub with no further contributions since it was created two years ago, while Dinosaur Ridge (Gangwon) is another short and also recently created article. I don't think its unreasonable to regard the Colorado formation as the primary topic, especially given its historical significance. Pageviews since the start of August don't indicate much interest in the others, and winding the clock back further to the start of 2017 doesn't paint a different picture. PC78 ( talk) 00:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• @ Coffeeandcrumbs, PC78, and Taewangkorea: There is a disambig page already at Dinosaur Ridge (disambiguation). Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 03:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC) reply
  • @ Anthony Appleyard: ...created about 8 hours ago, yes. I believe the intention was to move that page to Dinosaur Ridge and disambiguate the Colorado one, which is the move I've contested. PC78 ( talk) 07:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC) reply

• Oppose per PC78. SnowFire ( talk) 15:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per PC78 Taewangkorea ( talk) 16:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per PC78. Station1 ( talk) 19:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per PC78. the clear primary topic for the name is Colorado, the other two should simply have a hat note, and the Gangwon quite possibly is better known in by the Chinese name and not the english translation.--- Kev min § 20:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.