![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The image on this article isn't particularly informative; it only shows the tip of the stalk, not the structure of the plant. There is one in the gallery which would work well if cropped. Thoughts? 67.249.96.125 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Agreed, I just changed the main image to the one of the whole plant, and moved the picture of the stalk to the gallery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.129.230 ( talk) 20:42, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
I learned in a class that this genus is tetraploid. Should this be noted in the article? Ninjatacoshell 17:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Many wiki articles describe root system of the plant (and depth). This is interesting to someone learning about the plant, especially removal.
1) pulling weeds will come out easier than wanted foliage, moreso if done regularly
2) some weed chemicals work on the principle of constricting week roots, while others are used
"The grains of D. sanguinalis -- naturalized [in North America] from Eurasia -- are edible and were highly prized by the Slavs. This crabgrass was at one point cultivated in Poland as a cereal plant." -- from page 471 of The Encyclopedia of Edible Plants of North America by Dr. Francois Couplan. Starhistory22 ( talk) 21:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Digitaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The image on this article isn't particularly informative; it only shows the tip of the stalk, not the structure of the plant. There is one in the gallery which would work well if cropped. Thoughts? 67.249.96.125 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Agreed, I just changed the main image to the one of the whole plant, and moved the picture of the stalk to the gallery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.129.230 ( talk) 20:42, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
I learned in a class that this genus is tetraploid. Should this be noted in the article? Ninjatacoshell 17:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Many wiki articles describe root system of the plant (and depth). This is interesting to someone learning about the plant, especially removal.
1) pulling weeds will come out easier than wanted foliage, moreso if done regularly
2) some weed chemicals work on the principle of constricting week roots, while others are used
"The grains of D. sanguinalis -- naturalized [in North America] from Eurasia -- are edible and were highly prized by the Slavs. This crabgrass was at one point cultivated in Poland as a cereal plant." -- from page 471 of The Encyclopedia of Edible Plants of North America by Dr. Francois Couplan. Starhistory22 ( talk) 21:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Digitaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)