GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wugapodes ( talk · contribs) 01:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Will review. Wugapodes ( talk) 01:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Quick Fail as I think the article will need to be largely rewritten to comply with the GA criteria. The article is not written in WP:WikiVoice and reads much more like a press release than an encyclopedia article which contributes to an overly promotional and non-neutral tone. I also have concerns about the use sources as almost all (11 of 16) are not independent of the topic. This is a big problem that I think also contributes to the promotional tone. I strongly recommend a peer review before renominating to help iron out the prose issues. Wugapodes ( talk) 03:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wugapodes ( talk · contribs) 01:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Will review. Wugapodes ( talk) 01:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Quick Fail as I think the article will need to be largely rewritten to comply with the GA criteria. The article is not written in WP:WikiVoice and reads much more like a press release than an encyclopedia article which contributes to an overly promotional and non-neutral tone. I also have concerns about the use sources as almost all (11 of 16) are not independent of the topic. This is a big problem that I think also contributes to the promotional tone. I strongly recommend a peer review before renominating to help iron out the prose issues. Wugapodes ( talk) 03:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)