(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; (emphasis added) This fails the bolded part
Hamtechperson03:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)reply
When I changed the info there, you reverted based on a source. The portion attributed to the source was contradictory. Also, see
WP:OWN. You look to me like you are OWNing the article.Hamtechperson13:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)reply
How is it contradictory? Your comment about ownership concerns me. Perhaps it seems that I am overly defensive of a small group of sources, but it's because the article has a fairly limited subject matter; therefore, there aren't too many reliable sources out there for me to use. I'll add the source to the intro if you want.
Tezero (
talk)
01:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)reply
It would be helpful to restate the questions here rather than an outline with just PASS/FAIL; that way I don't have to keep flipping between the criteria and the assessment. --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)03:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
So was this passed and just not listed as such, or are we still waiting for the sourcing? --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)
(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; (emphasis added) This fails the bolded part
Hamtechperson03:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)reply
When I changed the info there, you reverted based on a source. The portion attributed to the source was contradictory. Also, see
WP:OWN. You look to me like you are OWNing the article.Hamtechperson13:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)reply
How is it contradictory? Your comment about ownership concerns me. Perhaps it seems that I am overly defensive of a small group of sources, but it's because the article has a fairly limited subject matter; therefore, there aren't too many reliable sources out there for me to use. I'll add the source to the intro if you want.
Tezero (
talk)
01:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)reply
It would be helpful to restate the questions here rather than an outline with just PASS/FAIL; that way I don't have to keep flipping between the criteria and the assessment. --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)03:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)reply
So was this passed and just not listed as such, or are we still waiting for the sourcing? --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)