This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chemistry B‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles B This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC) reply

I think a diagram of a DSC would be more valuable than a picture of the actual machine. Hscelsi3 ( talk) 00:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

"There are two different conventions..." only lists one.

I think on the DSC graph the peaks and valley which correspond to crystallization and melting are switched. THe peak should be melting and the valley be crystallization. 130.49.144.110 ( talk) 21:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I was just going to make that observation ... Abtract ( talk) 16:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC) reply