![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
As mentioned at Requests for feedback, the main recommendation I have right now for the article would be to reword it to eliminate the anthropomorphization of "dust particles". Specifically:
The words in red should be changed to something less... subjective. ;)
Other than that, I think it is probably ready to have the "unreviewed" tag replaced and for it to be classified as a "stub class" article, which I will do momentarily. I am also still considering whether to formally propose that this material be merged into the exisitng
Doppler effect article, though I do understand the reasoning already given by the article's creator at
RfF on that point.No, on further consideration I agree for now that this material merits it's own article.
WikiDao
☯
23:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
i always felt my my wording there was a tad clumsy so i appreciate your comments. I revised my wording to make it read as clearly as I could and feel much better about it. Upthetrail ( talk) 20:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
As mentioned at Requests for feedback, the main recommendation I have right now for the article would be to reword it to eliminate the anthropomorphization of "dust particles". Specifically:
The words in red should be changed to something less... subjective. ;)
Other than that, I think it is probably ready to have the "unreviewed" tag replaced and for it to be classified as a "stub class" article, which I will do momentarily. I am also still considering whether to formally propose that this material be merged into the exisitng
Doppler effect article, though I do understand the reasoning already given by the article's creator at
RfF on that point.No, on further consideration I agree for now that this material merits it's own article.
WikiDao
☯
23:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
i always felt my my wording there was a tad clumsy so i appreciate your comments. I revised my wording to make it read as clearly as I could and feel much better about it. Upthetrail ( talk) 20:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)