This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dietary Reference Intake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on Spring 2007.
Above undated message substituted from Template:EducationalAssignment by Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 22:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Introduced as an empty section by User:Vwalvekar ( talk). Presumably the intended question is "Why is the UL on Mg less than the RDA? That looks wrong."
Hi editors. After a recent edit (by Ceruleanix) we got that this parameter cautions "against excessive intake of nutrients (like vitamin A and selenium) that can be harmful in large amounts". I would generalize a statement in brackets to "(like vitamins and minerals)". Because, in my opinion, the former one makes an impression that only some (a few of) nutrients (like those mentioned) have tolerable upper intake limits. What do you say? Tosha Langue ( talk) 08:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
The Adherence level is a little old, being from 2004. NHANES has since then continued to be updated and logically someone should have produced an updated dataset. Unfortunately I have failed to find something like that so far: PMID 33802295 and 32531972 (both from MDPI, heh) come close, but the former covers preschool kids and the latter only covers a handful of nutrients.
Oh, 32531972 cites 31581561 (also MDPI, duh), which seems to cover a larger set of nutrients, but does not provide inadequacy rates not segregated by "short sleep". That's one step closer at least. Artoria 2e5 🌉 15:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dietary Reference Intake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on Spring 2007.
Above undated message substituted from Template:EducationalAssignment by Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 22:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Introduced as an empty section by User:Vwalvekar ( talk). Presumably the intended question is "Why is the UL on Mg less than the RDA? That looks wrong."
Hi editors. After a recent edit (by Ceruleanix) we got that this parameter cautions "against excessive intake of nutrients (like vitamin A and selenium) that can be harmful in large amounts". I would generalize a statement in brackets to "(like vitamins and minerals)". Because, in my opinion, the former one makes an impression that only some (a few of) nutrients (like those mentioned) have tolerable upper intake limits. What do you say? Tosha Langue ( talk) 08:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
The Adherence level is a little old, being from 2004. NHANES has since then continued to be updated and logically someone should have produced an updated dataset. Unfortunately I have failed to find something like that so far: PMID 33802295 and 32531972 (both from MDPI, heh) come close, but the former covers preschool kids and the latter only covers a handful of nutrients.
Oh, 32531972 cites 31581561 (also MDPI, duh), which seems to cover a larger set of nutrients, but does not provide inadequacy rates not segregated by "short sleep". That's one step closer at least. Artoria 2e5 🌉 15:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)