This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

South Africa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Novels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Springbokboeke is described as invaluable in the Mail & Guardian article, but every page, including this one, is riddled with "buy" buttons. So I'm leaving the link to its page on the series here rather than making it an external link in the article. Yngvadottir ( talk) 16:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC) reply

The paragraph stating that there are inconsistencies in the stories regarding Spikkels and Simson is incorrect. True, they are leopards ("luiperd" in Afrikaans). However, it is also common language to refer to leopards as tigers ("tier" in Afrikaans), as true tigers are not found in southern Africa. The few places where cheetahs ("jagluiperd" in Afrikaans) are mentioned, it is not directed at Spikkels and Simson, for example see "Rooi Maskers". In my opinion that whole paragraph is unsubstantiated, and thus I've removed it. -- RISadler ( talk) 10:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply