![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
"Reverted 1 edit by DarkCryst; Until there's some assertion of notability backed up by refs to independent reliable sources, let's not bring this back. (TW)"
Given the fact that: 1. This method is in use in Adobe Lightroom 2. A method in itself cannot be proven right or wrong. It can only be proven to be fit for a purpose. However in the case of cropping images there is no ultimate proof in right or wrong use. 3. The use of this method be researched at multiple universities in the Netherlands.
I suggest to leave this page up, or expand it, until someone finds proof that use of this method is malpractice. Mostly since beneficial use of this method has already been proven by the inventor and has been confirmed independently. For references see http://www.diagonaalmethode.info.
Deleting this content with the sole argument that it is not backup up by independent reliable refs is a fallacy: 1. There is a reliable reference: namely to the independent magazine Focus 2. Applying this argument to all recent scientific advances would deny them an entry into the Wikipedia. Since only one reference to the original publication is not enough according to the above argumentation. Furthermore it might take quite some time before original publications are backed up by others. The author has proven its findings, and no one has yet disproved the findings.
Furthermore 'notability' and 'reliability' are not fixed values, subjective, and open to interpretation. Thus a significant number of people (random sampling) should be asked for their opinion in this particular matter before one is to delete the page.
This "method" is in fact the Rabatment (see Rabatment of the rectangle). This is researched in lengths and includes also the diagonals of the inscribed squares. For example Charles Bouleau describes it on pages 43 to 46 of his book ""Bouleau, Charles (1963). The painter’s secret geometry: a study of composition in art. New York: Harcourt, Brace." The statement of the "inventor" that artists place elements unconsciously shows that he doesn't know how artists worked and still work - they place all elements very consciously. There was a significant loss of knowledge about this in the 20th century but it slowly re-establishes. Regarding photography: Even photographers do place their subjects consciously using systems of design, for example dynamic symmetry or rabatment. Examples are Annie Leibowitz or Bresson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.46.17.185 ( talk) 13:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
"Reverted 1 edit by DarkCryst; Until there's some assertion of notability backed up by refs to independent reliable sources, let's not bring this back. (TW)"
Given the fact that: 1. This method is in use in Adobe Lightroom 2. A method in itself cannot be proven right or wrong. It can only be proven to be fit for a purpose. However in the case of cropping images there is no ultimate proof in right or wrong use. 3. The use of this method be researched at multiple universities in the Netherlands.
I suggest to leave this page up, or expand it, until someone finds proof that use of this method is malpractice. Mostly since beneficial use of this method has already been proven by the inventor and has been confirmed independently. For references see http://www.diagonaalmethode.info.
Deleting this content with the sole argument that it is not backup up by independent reliable refs is a fallacy: 1. There is a reliable reference: namely to the independent magazine Focus 2. Applying this argument to all recent scientific advances would deny them an entry into the Wikipedia. Since only one reference to the original publication is not enough according to the above argumentation. Furthermore it might take quite some time before original publications are backed up by others. The author has proven its findings, and no one has yet disproved the findings.
Furthermore 'notability' and 'reliability' are not fixed values, subjective, and open to interpretation. Thus a significant number of people (random sampling) should be asked for their opinion in this particular matter before one is to delete the page.
This "method" is in fact the Rabatment (see Rabatment of the rectangle). This is researched in lengths and includes also the diagonals of the inscribed squares. For example Charles Bouleau describes it on pages 43 to 46 of his book ""Bouleau, Charles (1963). The painter’s secret geometry: a study of composition in art. New York: Harcourt, Brace." The statement of the "inventor" that artists place elements unconsciously shows that he doesn't know how artists worked and still work - they place all elements very consciously. There was a significant loss of knowledge about this in the 20th century but it slowly re-establishes. Regarding photography: Even photographers do place their subjects consciously using systems of design, for example dynamic symmetry or rabatment. Examples are Annie Leibowitz or Bresson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.46.17.185 ( talk) 13:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)