This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 5 May 2014 by reviewer Joe Decker ( talk · contribs). Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance Dharawal National Park is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Protected areas B‑class Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles B This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some material, I'm told, was taken from the 2006 Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) report, which states: "Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment". I'm working from the good-faith belief that this restriction is compatible with our CC-BY-SA requirements. -- j⚛e decker ^talk 19:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Some material? Over thrity direct quotes from one source alone and many other direct copy/edit gives rise to blatant plagiarism. Rangasyd ( talk) 12:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC) reply