This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The paragraph: "It is also a Bengali surname which is common in Kolkata and other parts of Bengal. Some names are Debendra Bijoy Dhar, Shyamal Dhar, Subhraneel Dhar etc." is absolutely irrelevant, and should be removed immediately. Joy1963 17:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
{{ WP India}} with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 11:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
There is no epigraphic or other historical evidence linking Dhar to king Mihira Bhoja of the Pratīhāra dynasty. It's been removed as a result.
Earlier edits have made a dog's breakfast out of this article. The parts dropped in using a "cut and paste" method are very close to vandalism see Wikipedia:Vandalism. Moreover, this article is in danger of becoming a soapbox, see Wikipedia:NOTSOAPBOX#SOAPBOX The Persian inscriptions in no case mention anybody "... proselytizing through torture", as offered to us in the edits of 117.254.76.170. This is an unsubstantiated assertion, unsupported by historical evidence. RoverDingbat
All this part has no references. Moreover, it seems more relevant to Dhar district than Dhar itself, so perhaps should be shifted there. Mandu has its own article. RoverDingbat
The geography section deals with Dhar DISTRCT as a whole and has been moved there. Zippymarmalade ( talk) 12:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC)zippymarmalade
The Agnivaṃśa affiliation of the Pawars is not directly relevant to the palace, so the discussion has been edited accordingly. Pawar article needs further development but that is, of course, a separate matter. RoverDingbat
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dhar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Someone called Serols is repeatedly rolling back the copyedits I'm making on Dhar. I don't know if this is someone manually doing it or a bot, but please stop. I am working on a Ctrl F replace all mistake I made earlier, but I want to keep my grammar edits in place as they took me hours. Shotgunscoop ( talk) 16:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Serols and Shotgunscoop, you're both talking past each other. The level of communication here has been minimal. The complete lack of informative edit summaries and the almost content-free statements here make it impossible to understand what information is unacceptable or why. I ask both of you to stop discussing the contributors and focus on the content. Shotgunscoop, what changes would you like to see in this article and what sources do you feel support those changes? Serols, you have been here long enough to know that good faith attempts to improve an article are not vandalism and to provide edit summaries that let others know why you are reverting changes. Please specify why you object to these changes. I hope that helps mediate this impasse at least slightly. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The paragraph: "It is also a Bengali surname which is common in Kolkata and other parts of Bengal. Some names are Debendra Bijoy Dhar, Shyamal Dhar, Subhraneel Dhar etc." is absolutely irrelevant, and should be removed immediately. Joy1963 17:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
{{ WP India}} with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 11:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
There is no epigraphic or other historical evidence linking Dhar to king Mihira Bhoja of the Pratīhāra dynasty. It's been removed as a result.
Earlier edits have made a dog's breakfast out of this article. The parts dropped in using a "cut and paste" method are very close to vandalism see Wikipedia:Vandalism. Moreover, this article is in danger of becoming a soapbox, see Wikipedia:NOTSOAPBOX#SOAPBOX The Persian inscriptions in no case mention anybody "... proselytizing through torture", as offered to us in the edits of 117.254.76.170. This is an unsubstantiated assertion, unsupported by historical evidence. RoverDingbat
All this part has no references. Moreover, it seems more relevant to Dhar district than Dhar itself, so perhaps should be shifted there. Mandu has its own article. RoverDingbat
The geography section deals with Dhar DISTRCT as a whole and has been moved there. Zippymarmalade ( talk) 12:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC)zippymarmalade
The Agnivaṃśa affiliation of the Pawars is not directly relevant to the palace, so the discussion has been edited accordingly. Pawar article needs further development but that is, of course, a separate matter. RoverDingbat
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dhar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Someone called Serols is repeatedly rolling back the copyedits I'm making on Dhar. I don't know if this is someone manually doing it or a bot, but please stop. I am working on a Ctrl F replace all mistake I made earlier, but I want to keep my grammar edits in place as they took me hours. Shotgunscoop ( talk) 16:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Serols and Shotgunscoop, you're both talking past each other. The level of communication here has been minimal. The complete lack of informative edit summaries and the almost content-free statements here make it impossible to understand what information is unacceptable or why. I ask both of you to stop discussing the contributors and focus on the content. Shotgunscoop, what changes would you like to see in this article and what sources do you feel support those changes? Serols, you have been here long enough to know that good faith attempts to improve an article are not vandalism and to provide edit summaries that let others know why you are reverting changes. Please specify why you object to these changes. I hope that helps mediate this impasse at least slightly. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)