This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Hello everybody! So, I think we have a bit of a conflict here. What I essentially did was remove the clutter, restructure the English, remove unverifiable resources, unsourced material, poorly written lead section, and IMDb links from the article. But,
Palmyglutsmaintains that I disrupted the article. Can we have a discussion here, please? Since
Cyphoidbomb and newly elected admin
Oshwah look like people who have recently edited the article, can we have some comments, please? Also,
this was added in my talk page this evening. Best, NairspechtiveTalk 06:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Nairspecht -
Cyphoidbomb made one revision to the article with
good faith concerns, and I don't see where I've edited the article at all. I don't quite understand your concerns... can you elaborate more so that I can help you?
~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 06:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) - I think the person who should be commenting here is the brand new editor who seems curiously possessive of this article. I don't see any glaring issues with your changes.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 06:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Oops! I mistook your (Oshwah's) edit test revert as an edit. Anyways, I think it's sorted now, thanks to Cyphoidbomb, unless Palmygluts has some opinions. Thank you for your time, both of you. See you around. Best, NairspechtiveTalk 06:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Hello everybody! So, I think we have a bit of a conflict here. What I essentially did was remove the clutter, restructure the English, remove unverifiable resources, unsourced material, poorly written lead section, and IMDb links from the article. But,
Palmyglutsmaintains that I disrupted the article. Can we have a discussion here, please? Since
Cyphoidbomb and newly elected admin
Oshwah look like people who have recently edited the article, can we have some comments, please? Also,
this was added in my talk page this evening. Best, NairspechtiveTalk 06:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Nairspecht -
Cyphoidbomb made one revision to the article with
good faith concerns, and I don't see where I've edited the article at all. I don't quite understand your concerns... can you elaborate more so that I can help you?
~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 06:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) - I think the person who should be commenting here is the brand new editor who seems curiously possessive of this article. I don't see any glaring issues with your changes.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 06:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Oops! I mistook your (Oshwah's) edit test revert as an edit. Anyways, I think it's sorted now, thanks to Cyphoidbomb, unless Palmygluts has some opinions. Thank you for your time, both of you. See you around. Best, NairspechtiveTalk 06:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply