![]() | Dhaka Residential Model College was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am assessing this article for WikiProject Schools following a request. A nice article, seems to pass the B-class criteria fine. Getting articles to good article/ featured article status is not my speciality though there are few suggestions I can give. Some of the article's punctuation needs to be checked, references should be after full stops and commas. Capital letters should normally only be used for proper nouns, and the first letter of section headings and sentences, see WP:MOSCAPS; capital letters seem to be used excessively in some areas e.g. most subject names should not be captialised. Bold is also sometimes overused, see WP:MOSBOLD. The image in the infobox should usually be the school logo, which can be uploaded under a claim of fair use. I have trouble following part of the lead, what a "shift" is needs to be made clearer. Avoid too much detail on one aspect in the lead it should only introduce and summarise the article per WP:LEAD. Some sections such as education are rather list like, per WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI prose with context to the school is better. The referencing seems okay, though there are a few gaps such as not all alumni having a reference. Also I get the impression that more parameters could be filled in for some refs. I am giving this article Mid-importance for now based on alumni. Camaron · Christopher · talk 10:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
I was asked but have little to add to Chris's words. However the quality is high and reflects the effort that must have gone into this article. Do not lose heart when you receive criticism, this deserves to make GA Victuallers ( talk) 17:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I note the request for re-assessment. I am not sure what else to add beyond my earlier tips, and not all of them have yet been implemented, though as Victuallers said this is still a good quality article. A GA reviewer will be along shortly to give a review. This article is already at the highest rating, B-class, which can be given outside the GA nomination process. I can however review the importance rating and after a review I have decided there is enough for High-importance. The list of alumni is short, but important people are listed. The school has also had national recognition in areas like debating and academic achievement. Camaron · Christopher · talk 18:44, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Nasty Housecat ( talk) 17:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Summary Comments:I am sorry to say that the article still has a ways to go to meet the GA criteria. The prose is much improved thanks to good copyediting, but there are issues with the remaining criteria that will prevent promotion at this time. Please see my comments below and please take them constructively. I recognize the hard work you have put into this piece and encourage you to continue to improve it.
My suggestion would be to address all of the concerns noted here , submit the article to another peer review, and address all of the suggestions you receive there before re-nominating this for GA again. I believe that will help you improve the article substantially.
General:
Lead:
History:
Admissions:
Curriculum:
Extracurricular Activities:
References:
External links:
Thanks for all your work on this article and please do not allow this to discourage you from continuing to contribute and renominate your work when it is ready. Best regards.
-- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 02:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
SMaster, I see that you have been doing heavy-duty copywriting on this article.
Celestra, thank you for finding my error. I knew it had to be obscure, but I sure couldn't find it!
I had made a TINY start and was feeling overwhelmed; I put the article aside for a few days and the issue was solved for me!!! (I was also looking at MoS on lists, because one of his bits of feedback said that prose should be used rather than lists, so I was trying to resolve the list issue in the History section.)
I appreciate the work you've done on behalf of the author. (My daughter's boyfriend is Bengali, so I felt some connection.)
I'm going to toss my printed off copy and keep my mitts off this project! Bettymnz4 ( talk) 23:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm doing another full copy edit of this article before it goes to WP:PR. I need some points clarified.
Other Notes:
-- S Masters ( talk) 18:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: Nasty Housecat ( talk) 03:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'll be doing the GA review. -- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 03:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This article is so improved since the last GAN that I hardly recognize it. Great work! I have a few minor comments, but I think it is looking very good:
-- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 00:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
-- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 13:06, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for not noticing this before: I see that you using shortened footnotes for Shandipan and Srijon, but there is no reference for them. I don't even see a full citation for them. See WP:CITESHORT for the correct way to do this. Baltimore City College is a good example, too. Fix that, and I believe all of the issues will be addressed. -- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 19:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
template in the footnote as you do elsewhere. Make sense? --
Nasty Housecat (
talk)
19:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Dhaka Residential Model College. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dhaka Residential Model College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Monthly cost Hostel 103.198.133.58 ( talk) 16:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Dhaka Residential Model College was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am assessing this article for WikiProject Schools following a request. A nice article, seems to pass the B-class criteria fine. Getting articles to good article/ featured article status is not my speciality though there are few suggestions I can give. Some of the article's punctuation needs to be checked, references should be after full stops and commas. Capital letters should normally only be used for proper nouns, and the first letter of section headings and sentences, see WP:MOSCAPS; capital letters seem to be used excessively in some areas e.g. most subject names should not be captialised. Bold is also sometimes overused, see WP:MOSBOLD. The image in the infobox should usually be the school logo, which can be uploaded under a claim of fair use. I have trouble following part of the lead, what a "shift" is needs to be made clearer. Avoid too much detail on one aspect in the lead it should only introduce and summarise the article per WP:LEAD. Some sections such as education are rather list like, per WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI prose with context to the school is better. The referencing seems okay, though there are a few gaps such as not all alumni having a reference. Also I get the impression that more parameters could be filled in for some refs. I am giving this article Mid-importance for now based on alumni. Camaron · Christopher · talk 10:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
I was asked but have little to add to Chris's words. However the quality is high and reflects the effort that must have gone into this article. Do not lose heart when you receive criticism, this deserves to make GA Victuallers ( talk) 17:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I note the request for re-assessment. I am not sure what else to add beyond my earlier tips, and not all of them have yet been implemented, though as Victuallers said this is still a good quality article. A GA reviewer will be along shortly to give a review. This article is already at the highest rating, B-class, which can be given outside the GA nomination process. I can however review the importance rating and after a review I have decided there is enough for High-importance. The list of alumni is short, but important people are listed. The school has also had national recognition in areas like debating and academic achievement. Camaron · Christopher · talk 18:44, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Nasty Housecat ( talk) 17:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Summary Comments:I am sorry to say that the article still has a ways to go to meet the GA criteria. The prose is much improved thanks to good copyediting, but there are issues with the remaining criteria that will prevent promotion at this time. Please see my comments below and please take them constructively. I recognize the hard work you have put into this piece and encourage you to continue to improve it.
My suggestion would be to address all of the concerns noted here , submit the article to another peer review, and address all of the suggestions you receive there before re-nominating this for GA again. I believe that will help you improve the article substantially.
General:
Lead:
History:
Admissions:
Curriculum:
Extracurricular Activities:
References:
External links:
Thanks for all your work on this article and please do not allow this to discourage you from continuing to contribute and renominate your work when it is ready. Best regards.
-- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 02:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
SMaster, I see that you have been doing heavy-duty copywriting on this article.
Celestra, thank you for finding my error. I knew it had to be obscure, but I sure couldn't find it!
I had made a TINY start and was feeling overwhelmed; I put the article aside for a few days and the issue was solved for me!!! (I was also looking at MoS on lists, because one of his bits of feedback said that prose should be used rather than lists, so I was trying to resolve the list issue in the History section.)
I appreciate the work you've done on behalf of the author. (My daughter's boyfriend is Bengali, so I felt some connection.)
I'm going to toss my printed off copy and keep my mitts off this project! Bettymnz4 ( talk) 23:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm doing another full copy edit of this article before it goes to WP:PR. I need some points clarified.
Other Notes:
-- S Masters ( talk) 18:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: Nasty Housecat ( talk) 03:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'll be doing the GA review. -- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 03:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This article is so improved since the last GAN that I hardly recognize it. Great work! I have a few minor comments, but I think it is looking very good:
-- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 00:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
-- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 13:06, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for not noticing this before: I see that you using shortened footnotes for Shandipan and Srijon, but there is no reference for them. I don't even see a full citation for them. See WP:CITESHORT for the correct way to do this. Baltimore City College is a good example, too. Fix that, and I believe all of the issues will be addressed. -- Nasty Housecat ( talk) 19:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
template in the footnote as you do elsewhere. Make sense? --
Nasty Housecat (
talk)
19:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Dhaka Residential Model College. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dhaka Residential Model College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Monthly cost Hostel 103.198.133.58 ( talk) 16:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)