Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 14:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The article looks to be in good shape but there are some issues that should be touched before passing it:

• The references has inconsistent linking. Pony Canyon is not linked while the rest of the publishers are linked.
• Alternatively, the Square Enix site could be used to source the book materials.
• If possible (though not necessary for a GA), the reception section could be expanded. Check [1], or [2].

Anyway, Good work in the article. Tintor2 ( talk) 14:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I need to rewrite a few things as well. Anyway thanks for taking up the review and sorry about the wait. —KirtZ ^Message 15:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Done. I didnt add the Fandom Post review since they have individual episode reviews and I'll try to merge most of their main points into a single paragraph at a later date. I also took some of Lucia's suggestions from here. I think it should be fine now. —KirtZ ^Message 17:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Great work. Tintor2 ( talk) 01:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC) reply