![]() | Devika Rani has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 6, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Devika Rani article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Devika Rani appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 May 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article mentions that Karma of 1929 is the first Indian sound movie. However, to the best of my knowledge, Alam Ara is the first Indian and hindi talkie. Or is it that Alam Ara is the first full-length talkie while Karma has few places where a soundtrack is available? Some one may please look into the matter. -- Gurubrahma 16:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Although she got a scholarship to study at the Royal Academy of Music to study acting and music, she didn't make a career in classical music, and is hardly of interest to that Wikiproject. -- Stfg ( talk) 12:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Dwaipayanc: It seems you have tagged the sentence "In an interview to journalist Raju Bharatan ... " with {{when}}. To my knowledge, the source doesn't mention any date. — Vensatry (ping) 18:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dwaipayanc ( talk · contribs) 21:58, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Done —
Vensatry
(ping)
05:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
In my opinion, this article meets GA criteria.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 02:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
At 22:28 just now, I made an edit which looks like [1] and said that I have provided sources for the change. Exactly one minute later, at 22:29, User:TheRedPenOfDoom reverted my edit with the summary "good faith, but not a reliable source." I am sure that he did not even have time to IDENTIFY what source I had provided, leave aside being able to assess whether it was a "reliable source" or not. So much for "good faith."
Please note that the source is quite reliable and nothing remotely derogatory or excessively laudatory has been said about the Devika Rani. Therefore please let other people contribute to this page. Please do not revert again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.128.152 ( talk) 22:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Devika Rani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Devika Rani has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 6, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Devika Rani article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Devika Rani appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 May 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article mentions that Karma of 1929 is the first Indian sound movie. However, to the best of my knowledge, Alam Ara is the first Indian and hindi talkie. Or is it that Alam Ara is the first full-length talkie while Karma has few places where a soundtrack is available? Some one may please look into the matter. -- Gurubrahma 16:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Although she got a scholarship to study at the Royal Academy of Music to study acting and music, she didn't make a career in classical music, and is hardly of interest to that Wikiproject. -- Stfg ( talk) 12:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Dwaipayanc: It seems you have tagged the sentence "In an interview to journalist Raju Bharatan ... " with {{when}}. To my knowledge, the source doesn't mention any date. — Vensatry (ping) 18:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dwaipayanc ( talk · contribs) 21:58, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Done —
Vensatry
(ping)
05:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
In my opinion, this article meets GA criteria.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 02:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
At 22:28 just now, I made an edit which looks like [1] and said that I have provided sources for the change. Exactly one minute later, at 22:29, User:TheRedPenOfDoom reverted my edit with the summary "good faith, but not a reliable source." I am sure that he did not even have time to IDENTIFY what source I had provided, leave aside being able to assess whether it was a "reliable source" or not. So much for "good faith."
Please note that the source is quite reliable and nothing remotely derogatory or excessively laudatory has been said about the Devika Rani. Therefore please let other people contribute to this page. Please do not revert again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.128.152 ( talk) 22:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Devika Rani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)