This   level-5 vital article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Iceland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

How can it be the most powerful of europe, in volume, if the Rheinfalls in Shaffhausen, Switzerland, have a volumic discharge 3 times higher? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.214.60.141 ( talk) 05:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC) reply

I suspect the wikipedia write-up is a slight exaggeration/simplification of the original source-material, which uses the term "magnitude." Problem is, there doesn't seem to be a widely-accepted usage of this term (as a precise metric) as regards waterfalls. Rheinfall does indeed seem to be a "bigger" waterfall by most reasonable metrics. ^[1] vs. ^[2]. Editing the article accordingly, to "largest waterfall in Iceland" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.70.182 ( talk) 17:21, 12 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The link to the vatnajokul website is now broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.105.229.72 ( talk) 08:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC) reply