![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Neutrality disputed? It seems like you are just trying to throw the kitchen sink at me without regard to any actual policy or guideline. Perhaps some other charge is appropriate? Getting people upset itself is not a policy violation Philogo. You have to actually justify being upset. So please explain exactly how descriptive interpretation is not neutral.
Couldn't find a good way to link to this section, so I have an image of the page of the source for you to look at: File:Des-int.jpg. I don't think I can keep that there however.
Pontiff Greg Bard ( talk) 22:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
IMHO etc etc It would be better if you wrote in th article "according to Carnap", or "Carnap distinguished" etc. so we could see who was saying what. Article could then add "this was disputed by" who argued that, and so on.
I have the impression that you very much agree with what Carnap said, and perhaps your enthusiasm causes you to present these views as gospel, so to speak. No intention on my part to cause upset: none seriously caused, surely? Aposite quote de jour:
It is all the same to me...whether it is your own opinion or not. It is the argument itself that I wish to probe, though it may turn out that both I who question and you who answer are equally under scrutiny. --Philogo 23:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Neutrality disputed? It seems like you are just trying to throw the kitchen sink at me without regard to any actual policy or guideline. Perhaps some other charge is appropriate? Getting people upset itself is not a policy violation Philogo. You have to actually justify being upset. So please explain exactly how descriptive interpretation is not neutral.
Couldn't find a good way to link to this section, so I have an image of the page of the source for you to look at: File:Des-int.jpg. I don't think I can keep that there however.
Pontiff Greg Bard ( talk) 22:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
IMHO etc etc It would be better if you wrote in th article "according to Carnap", or "Carnap distinguished" etc. so we could see who was saying what. Article could then add "this was disputed by" who argued that, and so on.
I have the impression that you very much agree with what Carnap said, and perhaps your enthusiasm causes you to present these views as gospel, so to speak. No intention on my part to cause upset: none seriously caused, surely? Aposite quote de jour:
It is all the same to me...whether it is your own opinion or not. It is the argument itself that I wish to probe, though it may turn out that both I who question and you who answer are equally under scrutiny. --Philogo 23:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)