| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MrClog ( talk · contribs) 18:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I will try to review this page in 7 days. -- MrClog ( talk) 18:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources): 
c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- Please see comments below.
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- Please see comment below.
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Placing this on hold until the comments below are addressed so that they can be fixed within 7 days. -- MrClog ( talk) 22:59, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
- (1b) The current introductory text does not at all mention the contents of the Background section. The article should summarise the most important point(s) of this section as well.
- (2b) Because "nationalist" is a contentious label,
In 1984, the nationalist Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP)
should be supported with an in-line citation. - (2b)
The council replied that they had no intention of "petitioning an English Queen to change the name of our Irish city"
contains a direct quotation and should as such be supported by an in-line reliable source. The current Londonderry Sentinel article used as a reference lists letters by readers, and because those writers are not subject to editorial review, their content is not reliable. A different source should be used. (This is no original research, as I reasonably belief that there'll be a reliable source available somewhere.) - (2b) Per
WP:RSPRIMARY,
[l]arge blocks of material based purely on primary sources should be avoided
. The Case section of the article is seemingly based almost entirely on a primary source (being the judge's ruling). - (3a) The section Background should contain some information on the nationalist vs unionist sentiments in Londonderry at the moment.
Failed "good article" nomination
It's been around 7 days and no attempts have been made to address the comments. Closing as failed. -- MrClog ( talk) 22:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MrClog ( talk · contribs) 18:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I will try to review this page in 7 days. -- MrClog ( talk) 18:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- Please see comments below.
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- Please see comment below.
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Placing this on hold until the comments below are addressed so that they can be fixed within 7 days. -- MrClog ( talk) 22:59, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
- (1b) The current introductory text does not at all mention the contents of the Background section. The article should summarise the most important point(s) of this section as well.
- (2b) Because "nationalist" is a contentious label,
In 1984, the nationalist Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP)
should be supported with an in-line citation. - (2b)
The council replied that they had no intention of "petitioning an English Queen to change the name of our Irish city"
contains a direct quotation and should as such be supported by an in-line reliable source. The current Londonderry Sentinel article used as a reference lists letters by readers, and because those writers are not subject to editorial review, their content is not reliable. A different source should be used. (This is no original research, as I reasonably belief that there'll be a reliable source available somewhere.) - (2b) Per
WP:RSPRIMARY,
[l]arge blocks of material based purely on primary sources should be avoided
. The Case section of the article is seemingly based almost entirely on a primary source (being the judge's ruling). - (3a) The section Background should contain some information on the nationalist vs unionist sentiments in Londonderry at the moment.
Failed "good article" nomination
It's been around 7 days and no attempts have been made to address the comments. Closing as failed. -- MrClog ( talk) 22:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)