From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Carbrera ( talk · contribs) 04:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply


Infobox

  • The movie poster image requires an alt description, so please add one
  • Any sources out there for the "budget" parameter?
  • Any sources out there for the "gross" parameter?

Lead

Paragraph 3

  • "Like several other films adapted by Korch's popular family novels, the film developed a cult following and is regarded as one of the best from the Korch-era." --> No source for this in the lead (or in the article); please add one

Plot

  • All great! :)

Cast

  • Great!

Production

  • There's no mention of the film being based off the book of the same name by Morten Korch here? This is a major piece to the article (and the film in particular!)
  • "The highly experienced Henning Karmark was the head producer of the film.[1]" --> "highly experienced" sounds a bit bias; please remove

Release and reception

  • "Journalist Svend Kragh-Jacobsen of Berlingske wrote a favorable review of the film on its release date.[8]" --> Anything to note about Kragh–Jacobsen's review here?
  • "The film was distributed to home media on DVD in 2003 and again in 2014 by Nordisk Film.[7]" --> Were both releases distributed by Nordisk Film?
  • Not the nominator, just a Dane with a fondness for this movie, but yes Nordisk Film owns the rights and did both releases.  MPJ -US  02:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply

End of GA Review:

A very good article with just a few mistakes. At first, I thought this may be missing some key things, but after a quick Google search, I realized this movie's article is really using all of its sources out there and ix extremely broad in its coverage! Great work! Please @PING me here with any questions, comments, or concerns. Once again, good job! Thanks and cheers, Carbrera ( talk) 02:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)! reply

Sorry, but I failed the article due to inactivity for over a week. Please renominate it in the future and I'll gladly review it again. Thanks. Cheers, Carbrera ( talk) 03:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC). reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Carbrera ( talk · contribs) 04:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply


Infobox

  • The movie poster image requires an alt description, so please add one
  • Any sources out there for the "budget" parameter?
  • Any sources out there for the "gross" parameter?

Lead

Paragraph 3

  • "Like several other films adapted by Korch's popular family novels, the film developed a cult following and is regarded as one of the best from the Korch-era." --> No source for this in the lead (or in the article); please add one

Plot

  • All great! :)

Cast

  • Great!

Production

  • There's no mention of the film being based off the book of the same name by Morten Korch here? This is a major piece to the article (and the film in particular!)
  • "The highly experienced Henning Karmark was the head producer of the film.[1]" --> "highly experienced" sounds a bit bias; please remove

Release and reception

  • "Journalist Svend Kragh-Jacobsen of Berlingske wrote a favorable review of the film on its release date.[8]" --> Anything to note about Kragh–Jacobsen's review here?
  • "The film was distributed to home media on DVD in 2003 and again in 2014 by Nordisk Film.[7]" --> Were both releases distributed by Nordisk Film?
  • Not the nominator, just a Dane with a fondness for this movie, but yes Nordisk Film owns the rights and did both releases.  MPJ -US  02:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply

End of GA Review:

A very good article with just a few mistakes. At first, I thought this may be missing some key things, but after a quick Google search, I realized this movie's article is really using all of its sources out there and ix extremely broad in its coverage! Great work! Please @PING me here with any questions, comments, or concerns. Once again, good job! Thanks and cheers, Carbrera ( talk) 02:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)! reply

Sorry, but I failed the article due to inactivity for over a week. Please renominate it in the future and I'll gladly review it again. Thanks. Cheers, Carbrera ( talk) 03:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC). reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook