This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Literature / Science / Contemporary Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature Philosophy of science Contemporary philosophy

I propose that the article Man and Technics be merged into this one, as the other article merely discusses the English translation of this book. -- Chuckhoffmann ( talk) 04:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC) reply

• Man and Technics is largely inaccurate—even the name is not proper English. Suggest it is simply deleted. Ankababel ( talk) 22:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC) reply

• All but one of the 9 references of this article come from the same source. Having recently read the original work, I have to say that the content of the article is not very accurate. Ankababel ( talk) 23:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC) reply