![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Aid dependency was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 March 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Dependency theory. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jgallaga. Peer reviewers:
Ericwilcox,
Jgallaga.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The last criticism listed, about “subjectivity”— “A large argument opposing the Dependency Theory is the subjectivity in the theory and the terms that are often used. Words such as developed and underdeveloped that construct the argument of dependency theory are subjective and different people will view these different terms in different lights”—is not reflected in the (extremely sparse!) source cited, which states, rather: “It has also been said that dependency theories are highly abstract and tend to use homogenising categories such as developed and underdeveloped, which do not fully capture the variations within these categories.” 67.173.178.159 ( talk) 21:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
The inclusion of the following statement has been subject of dispute:
I would argue that as it is expressed here it does not belong in the article since it presents a subjective evaluation as a fact. It also contains some unfortunate oversimplifications like "other countries produce goods with these ores with which Armenia then buys from them" that are not properly backed by a studt of supply chains. Lappspira ( talk) 08:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
References
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Aid dependency was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 March 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Dependency theory. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jgallaga. Peer reviewers:
Ericwilcox,
Jgallaga.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The last criticism listed, about “subjectivity”— “A large argument opposing the Dependency Theory is the subjectivity in the theory and the terms that are often used. Words such as developed and underdeveloped that construct the argument of dependency theory are subjective and different people will view these different terms in different lights”—is not reflected in the (extremely sparse!) source cited, which states, rather: “It has also been said that dependency theories are highly abstract and tend to use homogenising categories such as developed and underdeveloped, which do not fully capture the variations within these categories.” 67.173.178.159 ( talk) 21:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
The inclusion of the following statement has been subject of dispute:
I would argue that as it is expressed here it does not belong in the article since it presents a subjective evaluation as a fact. It also contains some unfortunate oversimplifications like "other countries produce goods with these ores with which Armenia then buys from them" that are not properly backed by a studt of supply chains. Lappspira ( talk) 08:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
References