![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 26 April 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Peer reviewers:
Hcutler,
Aarnold15.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
GOGHVAN195.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation of articles regarding specific prisons here. -- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 01:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Is this some legal theory terminology? I've never heard of "sanctions, which can be positive (rewarding)". Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 02:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
You are not allowed to reinstate a {{ prod}} template once it has been removed in good faith: "If any person (even the author him/herself) objects to the deletion (usually by removing the {{ proposed deletion}} tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed." Your first addition [1]. Your reinstatement. [2] Please revert yourself. Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 20:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
To object to and therefore permanently prevent a proposed deletion, remove the proposed deletion tag from the article. You are encouraged, but not required, to also:
You are not required to follow these steps, but in the interest of good faith editing and general courtesy I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that you offer your rationale as to why this article should not be deleted.-- JeffJ ( talk) 20:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
The citation for the article's statement "As an academic discipline, corrections also goes by the older name of penology" states "Earlier scholars were more honest, calling what we now call corrections by the name penology, which means the study of punishment for crime." In the context of the entire "What is corrections" section, the author considers the term corrections to be an inaccurate euphemism, and does not denigrate penology as an "older name". As such, the citation is not a valid one and has been removed. -- JeffJ ( talk) 19:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
I see a different page number was added for an unspecified "volume", I assume meaning edition or printing. [3] It would help if the ISBN and details for that are provided. My 9th edition has xxxi, 1920 p., OCLC 420487111 ISBN 9780314199492. Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 01:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I blanked the entire stupid section. Not only is it severely poorly written. It has no citation and screams "PoV". If someone feels like putting it back in albeit heavily reworded then that's fine, but at this point there's no reason for it to currently exist as it does.
"Blanking out" this section was the best thing that's happened to this website.
72.203.101.241 ( talk) 20:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 26 April 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Peer reviewers:
Hcutler,
Aarnold15.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
GOGHVAN195.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation of articles regarding specific prisons here. -- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 01:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Is this some legal theory terminology? I've never heard of "sanctions, which can be positive (rewarding)". Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 02:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
You are not allowed to reinstate a {{ prod}} template once it has been removed in good faith: "If any person (even the author him/herself) objects to the deletion (usually by removing the {{ proposed deletion}} tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed." Your first addition [1]. Your reinstatement. [2] Please revert yourself. Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 20:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
To object to and therefore permanently prevent a proposed deletion, remove the proposed deletion tag from the article. You are encouraged, but not required, to also:
You are not required to follow these steps, but in the interest of good faith editing and general courtesy I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that you offer your rationale as to why this article should not be deleted.-- JeffJ ( talk) 20:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
The citation for the article's statement "As an academic discipline, corrections also goes by the older name of penology" states "Earlier scholars were more honest, calling what we now call corrections by the name penology, which means the study of punishment for crime." In the context of the entire "What is corrections" section, the author considers the term corrections to be an inaccurate euphemism, and does not denigrate penology as an "older name". As such, the citation is not a valid one and has been removed. -- JeffJ ( talk) 19:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
I see a different page number was added for an unspecified "volume", I assume meaning edition or printing. [3] It would help if the ISBN and details for that are provided. My 9th edition has xxxi, 1920 p., OCLC 420487111 ISBN 9780314199492. Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 01:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I blanked the entire stupid section. Not only is it severely poorly written. It has no citation and screams "PoV". If someone feels like putting it back in albeit heavily reworded then that's fine, but at this point there's no reason for it to currently exist as it does.
"Blanking out" this section was the best thing that's happened to this website.
72.203.101.241 ( talk) 20:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)