This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Demographics of Edmonton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've changed the chart name from "visible minorities" to "ethnicities". I found it odd that only visible minorities were included and white/aboriginal were omitted. Wikipedia is suppose to be unbiased. Having a chart specially for people of certain colours is odd. There should be a chart that includes everyone. This accomplishes that. UrbanNerd ( talk) 04:23, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I agree the majority of the population should be represented to remain unbiased and be encyclopedic, and this would accomplish that while maintaining consistency with the source and using the proper term in the title that applies to the records within the table.
In terms of actual ethnicities, such a table should be based on StatCan's Ethnic origins series of data, which uses ethnicities instead of aggregations. Hwy43 ( talk) 05:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Demographics of Edmonton's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "2011censusABmunis":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
does anyone know how to update this to the 2016 census?
Calculations are wrong for edmonton demographics. 2607:FEA8:6560:274D:51A0:EB5C:1305:5D17 ( talk) 13:55, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Demographics of Edmonton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've changed the chart name from "visible minorities" to "ethnicities". I found it odd that only visible minorities were included and white/aboriginal were omitted. Wikipedia is suppose to be unbiased. Having a chart specially for people of certain colours is odd. There should be a chart that includes everyone. This accomplishes that. UrbanNerd ( talk) 04:23, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I agree the majority of the population should be represented to remain unbiased and be encyclopedic, and this would accomplish that while maintaining consistency with the source and using the proper term in the title that applies to the records within the table.
In terms of actual ethnicities, such a table should be based on StatCan's Ethnic origins series of data, which uses ethnicities instead of aggregations. Hwy43 ( talk) 05:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Demographics of Edmonton's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "2011censusABmunis":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
does anyone know how to update this to the 2016 census?
Calculations are wrong for edmonton demographics. 2607:FEA8:6560:274D:51A0:EB5C:1305:5D17 ( talk) 13:55, 12 November 2022 (UTC)