This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All four hill committee articles had redundant and partly incorrect or misleading information. I have created a hill committee article and removed the material not specific to the individual committees from their respective articles. It's actually arguable whether we need separate articles at all, given how similar all four are in structure and function. RadicalSubversiv E
This is an encyclopedia article, not a current-events summary. In the scheme of the DSCC and its entire history, the two staffers being suspended seem fairly minor (they should be mentioned at Michael Steele, however). As such, I've removed this--there's no way we'd include a similar incident if it had occurred in 1966. Best wishes, Meelar (talk) 13:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Image:Dscclogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
The section on 2015-2016 needs to be updated to reflect 2016 election results - and that the 2016 election is now in the past! C. Cerf ( talk) 15:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
I came to this page hoping to find out what DSCC does. Does it give money to the campaigns of individual candidates, or does it run ads and do other campaigning itself, or both? I don't see an answer. Seems like basic information that should be in the first paragraph. JWWalker ( talk) 16:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Also: what are the limits on contributing to the DSCC? What are the limits on DSCC contributions to campaigns? How much did the DSCC give to campaigns in the most recent cycle? How much were their other expenditures? And finally, how does the DSCC differ from the Senate Majority PAC, which is mostly run by the same people? C. Cerf ( talk) 20:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
This has to stop!!! 72.195.197.113 ( talk) 01:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
The Senate has to sanction Russian oil!!!
The USA can up their production in our country.
Get your act together. 72.195.197.113 ( talk) 01:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All four hill committee articles had redundant and partly incorrect or misleading information. I have created a hill committee article and removed the material not specific to the individual committees from their respective articles. It's actually arguable whether we need separate articles at all, given how similar all four are in structure and function. RadicalSubversiv E
This is an encyclopedia article, not a current-events summary. In the scheme of the DSCC and its entire history, the two staffers being suspended seem fairly minor (they should be mentioned at Michael Steele, however). As such, I've removed this--there's no way we'd include a similar incident if it had occurred in 1966. Best wishes, Meelar (talk) 13:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Image:Dscclogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
The section on 2015-2016 needs to be updated to reflect 2016 election results - and that the 2016 election is now in the past! C. Cerf ( talk) 15:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
I came to this page hoping to find out what DSCC does. Does it give money to the campaigns of individual candidates, or does it run ads and do other campaigning itself, or both? I don't see an answer. Seems like basic information that should be in the first paragraph. JWWalker ( talk) 16:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Also: what are the limits on contributing to the DSCC? What are the limits on DSCC contributions to campaigns? How much did the DSCC give to campaigns in the most recent cycle? How much were their other expenditures? And finally, how does the DSCC differ from the Senate Majority PAC, which is mostly run by the same people? C. Cerf ( talk) 20:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
This has to stop!!! 72.195.197.113 ( talk) 01:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
The Senate has to sanction Russian oil!!!
The USA can up their production in our country.
Get your act together. 72.195.197.113 ( talk) 01:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)