![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
The version of this page dated 16 April 2006, 15:38 contains large portions of text copied verbatim from the Delta Trianguli page at [1]. The editor who inserted this text also removed most of the catalogue references from the starbox, and a link to the catalogue of binary star orbital elements from which the visual binary orbit was taken.
I am thus reverting this article. Chaos syndrome 17:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
User:Hurricane Devon keeps removing catalogue information and the link to the catalogue from which the visual binary orbit for Delta Trianguli was taken. Please could this user justify this removal of information from the article! Chaos syndrome 19:30, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I have checked the catalogues against SIMBAD and corrected two errors:
-- B.D.Mills ( T, C) 02:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
This edit included a large quantity of material copied pretty much straight from the copyrighted website SolStation, with a few wording changes to try and disguise the source. I therefore have reverted the article to its state before the copyrighted material was added. Icalanise ( talk) 22:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
The circle in the starbox graphic points to an empty area of space. Additionally, the SIMBAD page has been updated with data from GAIA, so the starbox should reflect at least some of those changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PlutonianEmpire ( talk • contribs) 05:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
The version of this page dated 16 April 2006, 15:38 contains large portions of text copied verbatim from the Delta Trianguli page at [1]. The editor who inserted this text also removed most of the catalogue references from the starbox, and a link to the catalogue of binary star orbital elements from which the visual binary orbit was taken.
I am thus reverting this article. Chaos syndrome 17:34, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
User:Hurricane Devon keeps removing catalogue information and the link to the catalogue from which the visual binary orbit for Delta Trianguli was taken. Please could this user justify this removal of information from the article! Chaos syndrome 19:30, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I have checked the catalogues against SIMBAD and corrected two errors:
-- B.D.Mills ( T, C) 02:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
This edit included a large quantity of material copied pretty much straight from the copyrighted website SolStation, with a few wording changes to try and disguise the source. I therefore have reverted the article to its state before the copyrighted material was added. Icalanise ( talk) 22:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
The circle in the starbox graphic points to an empty area of space. Additionally, the SIMBAD page has been updated with data from GAIA, so the starbox should reflect at least some of those changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PlutonianEmpire ( talk • contribs) 05:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)