This article was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Logic / Ancient Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Logic Ancient philosophy Linguistics: Applied Linguistics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

As discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deliberative, this article is actually about deliberative rhetoric, and it contains a great deal of discussion of Aristotle's Rhetoric. Therefore, I propose merging the commentary on Aristotle's book to Rhetoric (Aristotle) and moving the remainder to Deliberative rhetoric. Cnilep ( talk) 05:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Hearing no objections or alternative suggestions, I have performed the split and the move. Cnilep ( talk) 05:32, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply