 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The plant in the photo is Deinostigma tamiana, not D. eberhardtii. D. tamiana was originally introduced to cultivation, misidentified, as Chirita eberhardtii and is still occasionally cultivated under that name, particularly in Europe. 160.111.254.17 ( talk) 16:50, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, I had wondered how the two species could look so identical. Sminthopsis84 ( talk) 17:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The plant in the photo is Deinostigma tamiana, not D. eberhardtii. D. tamiana was originally introduced to cultivation, misidentified, as Chirita eberhardtii and is still occasionally cultivated under that name, particularly in Europe. 160.111.254.17 ( talk) 16:50, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, I had wondered how the two species could look so identical. Sminthopsis84 ( talk) 17:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)