From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk · contribs) 12:31, 4 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 12:31, 4 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Infobox and lead

Yeah, Toronto, Ontario seems like a better option. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 00:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Done. ToQ100gou ( talk) 01:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • The infobox genre and runtime need references per the template.
    • Sources I've already used in this article describe it as a teen drama so this is no problem (there is also the entire section where it discusses it's influence on the genre), but how would you reference the runtime? ToQ100gou ( talk) 00:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
The guidelines on the template say that the genre and runtime need sources.
On finding a source, I would look for newspaper clippings, books, TV Guides, or reviews with runtimes.
Done. ToQ100gou ( talk) 07:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Not sure "and others" is necessary. The "starring" section should mention every lead in the opening credits / link to character list.
    • The show does not contain opening cast credits, and the ending credits vary depending on the characters relevant to the episode. The starring section lists all the actors in the show who played notable characters that already have articles. I can remove that and replace it the character list if that's a problem. ToQ100gou ( talk) 00:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
If the "starring" section is not definitive then a character list link would be better. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 01:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Done. ToQ100gou ( talk) 01:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Development

Premise

Cast

Episodes

  • No issues here.

Print media

Release

Yes. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 02:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Reception and impact

  • See WP:RECEPTION.
    • I already have, I've been continuously trying to make the section not seem repetitive, even though in my opinion, there's only so much literary gymnastics you can do over what truly does boil down to "he said this, she said this". I don't mind suggestions. ToQ100gou ( talk) 02:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • The last sentence in the first paragraph of #In_popular_culture needs a source.
  • Be consistent with the dmy format here too.
    • As above, fixed.
  • "it's" is a contraction between it and is. However, several sections in this article use "it's" to describe a season (ex. "it's second season") when it should be "its second season" so correct them. They can be found in "First-run broadcast", "Critical reception", and "Awards and nominations".

Awards and nominations

  • See above.

References and other comments

Progress

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c ( OR):
    d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk · contribs) 12:31, 4 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 12:31, 4 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Infobox and lead

Yeah, Toronto, Ontario seems like a better option. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 00:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Done. ToQ100gou ( talk) 01:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • The infobox genre and runtime need references per the template.
    • Sources I've already used in this article describe it as a teen drama so this is no problem (there is also the entire section where it discusses it's influence on the genre), but how would you reference the runtime? ToQ100gou ( talk) 00:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
The guidelines on the template say that the genre and runtime need sources.
On finding a source, I would look for newspaper clippings, books, TV Guides, or reviews with runtimes.
Done. ToQ100gou ( talk) 07:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Not sure "and others" is necessary. The "starring" section should mention every lead in the opening credits / link to character list.
    • The show does not contain opening cast credits, and the ending credits vary depending on the characters relevant to the episode. The starring section lists all the actors in the show who played notable characters that already have articles. I can remove that and replace it the character list if that's a problem. ToQ100gou ( talk) 00:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
If the "starring" section is not definitive then a character list link would be better. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 01:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Done. ToQ100gou ( talk) 01:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Development

Premise

Cast

Episodes

  • No issues here.

Print media

Release

Yes. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 02:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Reception and impact

  • See WP:RECEPTION.
    • I already have, I've been continuously trying to make the section not seem repetitive, even though in my opinion, there's only so much literary gymnastics you can do over what truly does boil down to "he said this, she said this". I don't mind suggestions. ToQ100gou ( talk) 02:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • The last sentence in the first paragraph of #In_popular_culture needs a source.
  • Be consistent with the dmy format here too.
    • As above, fixed.
  • "it's" is a contraction between it and is. However, several sections in this article use "it's" to describe a season (ex. "it's second season") when it should be "its second season" so correct them. They can be found in "First-run broadcast", "Critical reception", and "Awards and nominations".

Awards and nominations

  • See above.

References and other comments

Progress

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c ( OR):
    d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook