This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I changed the US name of the band to "Definition FX" because that's the way they've been 'marketed' in the US. Feel free to change it back if the "F" stood for Function. You might recognize my username as an American spelling of a Def FX reference....I'm a huge fan (Are you out there Dodge?). Sublium 02:05, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
A few simple factual errors and dates have been modified by Sean Lowry (Feb 10, 2005).
Heya guys, I used to run alt.nrg.bond (the semi-official Def FX history website) and this article has many significant errors in it (I'm surprised Sean didn't pick them all up!). I've made some changes tonight, but I'll need to pull out my archives to make more. And Sublium - I ran into Dodge last year at KMFDM in Sydney (he's an old friend of mine). He's still out there... Poppiestar 13:25, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
The first sentence opened with "Def FX (1990-1997) were an Australian industrial-dance-rock group, formed in Sydney." I changed "were" to "was" to be grammatically correct (it got under my skin). Def FX is a singular group although it has the sound of "Def Effects." If you broke it down it would say, "Def FX were a group." Whether or not you would like to make the argument that "Def FX" is plural, "a group" is denoting a singular subject. Xe7al 08:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi I uploaded the three missing images from the discography, but they have since been deleted.
Can someone explain if there is a legal difference as to why some images are allowed, but not all, in one case even within a single publisher?
From my post to the deletor's talk page:
Def FX album cover images Why were these images deleted? I uploaded them so the wikipedia discography could be complete, so how are the circumstances different? Looking at the page again 2, I can see that two of the images were released by different publishers compared with extant and apparently allowed images. But the cover for Surge EP was also published by Phantom records, so surely if they have released images for all their other Def FX releases then they would have for this one too?
Also: Does it make any difference that the scans were of personal, autographed copies? They were in faint gold ink in the scans, just visible.
Cheers!
Retrieved from " http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Motopark" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhonjimbomp ( talk • contribs) 10:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Def FX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I changed the US name of the band to "Definition FX" because that's the way they've been 'marketed' in the US. Feel free to change it back if the "F" stood for Function. You might recognize my username as an American spelling of a Def FX reference....I'm a huge fan (Are you out there Dodge?). Sublium 02:05, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
A few simple factual errors and dates have been modified by Sean Lowry (Feb 10, 2005).
Heya guys, I used to run alt.nrg.bond (the semi-official Def FX history website) and this article has many significant errors in it (I'm surprised Sean didn't pick them all up!). I've made some changes tonight, but I'll need to pull out my archives to make more. And Sublium - I ran into Dodge last year at KMFDM in Sydney (he's an old friend of mine). He's still out there... Poppiestar 13:25, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
The first sentence opened with "Def FX (1990-1997) were an Australian industrial-dance-rock group, formed in Sydney." I changed "were" to "was" to be grammatically correct (it got under my skin). Def FX is a singular group although it has the sound of "Def Effects." If you broke it down it would say, "Def FX were a group." Whether or not you would like to make the argument that "Def FX" is plural, "a group" is denoting a singular subject. Xe7al 08:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi I uploaded the three missing images from the discography, but they have since been deleted.
Can someone explain if there is a legal difference as to why some images are allowed, but not all, in one case even within a single publisher?
From my post to the deletor's talk page:
Def FX album cover images Why were these images deleted? I uploaded them so the wikipedia discography could be complete, so how are the circumstances different? Looking at the page again 2, I can see that two of the images were released by different publishers compared with extant and apparently allowed images. But the cover for Surge EP was also published by Phantom records, so surely if they have released images for all their other Def FX releases then they would have for this one too?
Also: Does it make any difference that the scans were of personal, autographed copies? They were in faint gold ink in the scans, just visible.
Cheers!
Retrieved from " http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Motopark" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhonjimbomp ( talk • contribs) 10:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Def FX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)