![]() | DeepStateMap.Live has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 23, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from DeepStateMap.Live appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 September 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Amitchell125 ( talk · contribs) 14:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Happy to review the article. AM
Lead section / infobox
|
---|
More comments to follow. Amitchell125 ( talk) 06:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC) |
1.1 Deep State UA
|
---|
|
1.2 DeepStateMap.Live
|
---|
|
1.3 Present day
|
---|
|
1.3.1 Fundraising
|
---|
|
2 Map characteristics
|
---|
|
3 Sourcing
|
---|
|
3.1 Factuality
|
---|
|
4 Media attention and use
|
---|
|
5 See also
|
---|
|
6 References
|
---|
I am using WP:ABOUTSELF as a guide to say the sources used in the Primary subsection are acceptable. The citations are imo allowable because the text cited by them is uncontraversial, is about the map, and can be taken to be authentic. However:
|
I'm putting the article on hold for a week until 22 24 August to allow time for the issues raised to be addressed. Regards,
Amitchell125 (
talk)
11:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Passing now, great work. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 05:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk)
21:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Johnson524 ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/DeepStateMap.Live; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
The quote above has recently been added by me and removed by @
100.8.98.146: over the past few days in the "Media attention and use" section. After the second revert by 100.8.98.146, I elected to bring the issue to the talk page. It is my belief the phrase, when used in the sentence News articles about the map itself or interviews with its creators have also notably been conducted by the [list of organizations]
, is important, because many companies have used the map- but these are just the more notable ones listed. If you go into the history of the article: many more notable organizations were once listed, but to not provide
WP:UNDUE weight to the section, it was agreed before the GA review to only include organizations with an article on English Wikipedia in the list.
100.8.98.146 has argued that this phrase was not supported by any reliable sources, but when I pointed out what is stated above, they told me to "stop acting like you own this article," and I'm in no mood to deal with that crap. @ Amitchell125: do you have anything to weigh in? I don't feel very strongly one way or another, and if this is in violation of WP:NPOV or some similar policy, then please remove it. Imo I still don't believe this is true in this particular situation, but I'll accept whatever you say. Cheers! Johnson 524 13:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | DeepStateMap.Live has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 23, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from DeepStateMap.Live appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 September 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Amitchell125 ( talk · contribs) 14:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Happy to review the article. AM
Lead section / infobox
|
---|
More comments to follow. Amitchell125 ( talk) 06:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC) |
1.1 Deep State UA
|
---|
|
1.2 DeepStateMap.Live
|
---|
|
1.3 Present day
|
---|
|
1.3.1 Fundraising
|
---|
|
2 Map characteristics
|
---|
|
3 Sourcing
|
---|
|
3.1 Factuality
|
---|
|
4 Media attention and use
|
---|
|
5 See also
|
---|
|
6 References
|
---|
I am using WP:ABOUTSELF as a guide to say the sources used in the Primary subsection are acceptable. The citations are imo allowable because the text cited by them is uncontraversial, is about the map, and can be taken to be authentic. However:
|
I'm putting the article on hold for a week until 22 24 August to allow time for the issues raised to be addressed. Regards,
Amitchell125 (
talk)
11:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Passing now, great work. Regards, Amitchell125 ( talk) 05:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk)
21:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Johnson524 ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/DeepStateMap.Live; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
The quote above has recently been added by me and removed by @
100.8.98.146: over the past few days in the "Media attention and use" section. After the second revert by 100.8.98.146, I elected to bring the issue to the talk page. It is my belief the phrase, when used in the sentence News articles about the map itself or interviews with its creators have also notably been conducted by the [list of organizations]
, is important, because many companies have used the map- but these are just the more notable ones listed. If you go into the history of the article: many more notable organizations were once listed, but to not provide
WP:UNDUE weight to the section, it was agreed before the GA review to only include organizations with an article on English Wikipedia in the list.
100.8.98.146 has argued that this phrase was not supported by any reliable sources, but when I pointed out what is stated above, they told me to "stop acting like you own this article," and I'm in no mood to deal with that crap. @ Amitchell125: do you have anything to weigh in? I don't feel very strongly one way or another, and if this is in violation of WP:NPOV or some similar policy, then please remove it. Imo I still don't believe this is true in this particular situation, but I'll accept whatever you say. Cheers! Johnson 524 13:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)