A fact from Deckmyn v Vandersteen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2014 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the European Court of Justice was asked the meaning of parody by the Court of Appeal of Brussels ? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/July.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. European Union ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles

How did the Belgian court decide after the ECJ? Inadmissible because of discrimination? 2A01:C23:BCAE:DE01:2996:1BB2:DD12:870 ( talk) 10:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

outdated. The decision came in September 2014: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=157281&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6655 -- 94.222.29.97 ( talk) 18:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC) reply

It is unclear which are the "four suggested characteristics of parody". Later, two chartacteristics are mentioned, but it is impossible to understand what's their relation to the supposed four. -- Ehitaja ( talk) 10:27, 11 November 2018 (UTC) reply