![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OK, first, unrelated, why does this redirect to Talk:August 2004 in sports? Just wondering.
Anyways, I hesitated adding the college football bowl schedule at first because I know it's a number of games. I finally decided to do so (although, apparently not everyone feels the same way), but here's my reasoning:
Anyways, I don't want to get into a revert war or anything, but I wanted to outline my rationale somewhere since there's not enough room in the edit summary. RADICALBENDER ★
I have an idea for a compromise on the bowl games: List the BCS games, which are the most important games each year. Keep in mind that the national championship game rotates between these bowls every year; for example, the Orange Bowl is this year's championship game. Dale Arnett 22:55, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Attention: Since I haven't heard anything against my compromise suggestion, I'll assume that it's OK to add the remaining three BCS games. I'll pull the New Orleans Bowl, since it's one of the most minor of the minor games. Dale Arnett 22:33, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Is it really "sports news" to note that the brother of a famous sportsman has decided to stay in the army? Let's keep a grip on things, people, else we'll be noting what sportpeople's dogs or cats are doing next! -- Arwel 12:00, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Might we agree on listing each day's events alphabetically by sport? That way it would be very quick'n'easy for readers to check out the sports events for whatever sport they follow which is listed. Just a suggestion; what do you think? -- Wernher 23:50, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I don't like the idea personally. As far as I'm concerned, when I see the first item in a list I assume it's the most important. Using yesterday as an example, I don't see biathlon being the biggest sporting event of the day on either side of the pond, but I think some visitors to this page might get that idea. Kirjtc2 21:05, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Just to let you guys know, I've created Template:Current sports (based on Template:Current) for articles regarding about sports only. Please feel free to use it. =) -- Andylkl 19:37, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
After seeing the format for the NBA scores, I figured that we should do the same for the other major sports (NFL, MLB, et al.) Examples of this format on NFL reports can be found on the December 18, 2004 section of the article. Wouldn't that be a good idea? JB82 16:08, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on December 2004 in sports. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OK, first, unrelated, why does this redirect to Talk:August 2004 in sports? Just wondering.
Anyways, I hesitated adding the college football bowl schedule at first because I know it's a number of games. I finally decided to do so (although, apparently not everyone feels the same way), but here's my reasoning:
Anyways, I don't want to get into a revert war or anything, but I wanted to outline my rationale somewhere since there's not enough room in the edit summary. RADICALBENDER ★
I have an idea for a compromise on the bowl games: List the BCS games, which are the most important games each year. Keep in mind that the national championship game rotates between these bowls every year; for example, the Orange Bowl is this year's championship game. Dale Arnett 22:55, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Attention: Since I haven't heard anything against my compromise suggestion, I'll assume that it's OK to add the remaining three BCS games. I'll pull the New Orleans Bowl, since it's one of the most minor of the minor games. Dale Arnett 22:33, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Is it really "sports news" to note that the brother of a famous sportsman has decided to stay in the army? Let's keep a grip on things, people, else we'll be noting what sportpeople's dogs or cats are doing next! -- Arwel 12:00, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Might we agree on listing each day's events alphabetically by sport? That way it would be very quick'n'easy for readers to check out the sports events for whatever sport they follow which is listed. Just a suggestion; what do you think? -- Wernher 23:50, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I don't like the idea personally. As far as I'm concerned, when I see the first item in a list I assume it's the most important. Using yesterday as an example, I don't see biathlon being the biggest sporting event of the day on either side of the pond, but I think some visitors to this page might get that idea. Kirjtc2 21:05, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Just to let you guys know, I've created Template:Current sports (based on Template:Current) for articles regarding about sports only. Please feel free to use it. =) -- Andylkl 19:37, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
After seeing the format for the NBA scores, I figured that we should do the same for the other major sports (NFL, MLB, et al.) Examples of this format on NFL reports can be found on the December 18, 2004 section of the article. Wouldn't that be a good idea? JB82 16:08, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on December 2004 in sports. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)