Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
In order to uphold the quality of
Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the
GA criteria as part of the
GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of
May 8,
2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from
WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at
WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at
WP:GAR.
I'm re-evaling the article as part of the
GA Sweeps. And to tell you the truth, it's not pretty. Unfortunalty, both the user who brought it to GAN,
Worldtraveller, and the reviewer,
CorbinSimpson are inactive and retired. Sadly, I am failing this article.
Res
Mar
13:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Well-written?:
Factually accurate and verifiable?:
Broad in its coverage:?:
Neutral?:
Stable?:
Illustrated?:
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
In order to uphold the quality of
Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the
GA criteria as part of the
GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of
May 8,
2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from
WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at
WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at
WP:GAR.
I'm re-evaling the article as part of the
GA Sweeps. And to tell you the truth, it's not pretty. Unfortunalty, both the user who brought it to GAN,
Worldtraveller, and the reviewer,
CorbinSimpson are inactive and retired. Sadly, I am failing this article.
Res
Mar
13:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Well-written?:
Factually accurate and verifiable?:
Broad in its coverage:?:
Neutral?:
Stable?:
Illustrated?: