This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Debian Almquist shell redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
The article doesn't give any information on what new or changed functionality it has compared to its parent shell, ash. Pimlottc 03:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Just to clear up: dash is not faster during script execution than bash, however it starts quite a bit faster so that there is a big performance boost when launching a large number of small shell scripts (like what's done during the init sequence). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.188.33.23 ( talk) 15:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Should such a statement say more specifically who believes dash to be more reliable? Mateub ( talk) 03:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC) mateub
So it should be simply "more reliable" or "more reliable because of fewer dependencies". 85.77.161.155 ( talk) 17:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Can the ugly and useless screenshot text be removed from the box? Or if not somebody could provide a screenie. (Doesn't make much sense, after all it's a shell we're talking here) 85.77.161.155 ( talk) 17:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Debian Almquist shell redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
The article doesn't give any information on what new or changed functionality it has compared to its parent shell, ash. Pimlottc 03:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Just to clear up: dash is not faster during script execution than bash, however it starts quite a bit faster so that there is a big performance boost when launching a large number of small shell scripts (like what's done during the init sequence). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.188.33.23 ( talk) 15:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Should such a statement say more specifically who believes dash to be more reliable? Mateub ( talk) 03:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC) mateub
So it should be simply "more reliable" or "more reliable because of fewer dependencies". 85.77.161.155 ( talk) 17:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Can the ugly and useless screenshot text be removed from the box? Or if not somebody could provide a screenie. (Doesn't make much sense, after all it's a shell we're talking here) 85.77.161.155 ( talk) 17:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)