Murder of Irene Garza has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 5, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ComputerJA ( talk · contribs) 03:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I'll happily review this article. Just by doing a quick overview, I can tell the article is well-written, properly uses reliable sources, and conforms to the appropriate layout. There was a recent update on the trial in the news, but we can discuss how to include that later. My review will consist of 2 parts. On the first one, I will go over any grammatical/spelling mistakes. On the second part, I will go over each source individually and check that the text is supported by them. Should not take me more than a few days. Please feel free to disagree with any of my suggestions. Anyways, thanks for writing this and I look forward to reviewing it. Big thanks, ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎)
This is the first part of my review. The article is very well written and did not find major issues with the prose. Below are my comments. I'll be going through the sources later and making sure the text is supported by the sources. Let me know if you have any questions! ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎) 04:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for taking on this review. I'll take a look at the DOB issue. I look forward to Part 2. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 05:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Update: I found the DOB on Find a Grave and in an apparently self-published book, so I am taking it out until I find an RS. The 1934 birth year, at least, is sourced to an article in The Monitor. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 06:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Above are my final comments. Few things needed to be addressed before we move forward with the nomination. Great job! ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎)
I ran a quick plagiarism test and found no serious issues. This article has passed, congratulations! I'll do the appropriate fixes shortly. Thanks for working on this interesting article, EricEnfermero. ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎) 16:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 10:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Death of Irene Garza → Murder of Irene Garza – a person was convicted of the murder of the subject, so "murder of ..." is a more accurate title. WWGB ( talk) 03:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
I am planning to bring this matter into the dispute resolution process. I would welcome comments from Larry Hockett on his reasons for originally reverting the edits on the Murder of Irene Garza article on 10/15 and then reverting it again on 10/16.
In his first reversion, Larry specifically mentioned my use of the word "notorious" in the text and commented on typos. He also thought the original version of the article was fine as it was. I had reverted the article back to my version on 10/16, fixed the typos and removed notorious. In my remarks, I encourage any and all future edits to the article. Larry reverted Irene Garza again the same day.
I quote from the help article on reverting "Reverting a contribution is sometimes appropriate. However, reverting good-faith actions of other editors can also be disruptive and may lead to the reverter being temporarily blocked from editing"
Murder of Irene Garza has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 5, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ComputerJA ( talk · contribs) 03:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I'll happily review this article. Just by doing a quick overview, I can tell the article is well-written, properly uses reliable sources, and conforms to the appropriate layout. There was a recent update on the trial in the news, but we can discuss how to include that later. My review will consist of 2 parts. On the first one, I will go over any grammatical/spelling mistakes. On the second part, I will go over each source individually and check that the text is supported by them. Should not take me more than a few days. Please feel free to disagree with any of my suggestions. Anyways, thanks for writing this and I look forward to reviewing it. Big thanks, ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎)
This is the first part of my review. The article is very well written and did not find major issues with the prose. Below are my comments. I'll be going through the sources later and making sure the text is supported by the sources. Let me know if you have any questions! ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎) 04:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for taking on this review. I'll take a look at the DOB issue. I look forward to Part 2. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 05:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Update: I found the DOB on Find a Grave and in an apparently self-published book, so I am taking it out until I find an RS. The 1934 birth year, at least, is sourced to an article in The Monitor. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 06:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Above are my final comments. Few things needed to be addressed before we move forward with the nomination. Great job! ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎)
I ran a quick plagiarism test and found no serious issues. This article has passed, congratulations! I'll do the appropriate fixes shortly. Thanks for working on this interesting article, EricEnfermero. ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎) 16:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 10:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Death of Irene Garza → Murder of Irene Garza – a person was convicted of the murder of the subject, so "murder of ..." is a more accurate title. WWGB ( talk) 03:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
I am planning to bring this matter into the dispute resolution process. I would welcome comments from Larry Hockett on his reasons for originally reverting the edits on the Murder of Irene Garza article on 10/15 and then reverting it again on 10/16.
In his first reversion, Larry specifically mentioned my use of the word "notorious" in the text and commented on typos. He also thought the original version of the article was fine as it was. I had reverted the article back to my version on 10/16, fixed the typos and removed notorious. In my remarks, I encourage any and all future edits to the article. Larry reverted Irene Garza again the same day.
I quote from the help article on reverting "Reverting a contribution is sometimes appropriate. However, reverting good-faith actions of other editors can also be disruptive and may lead to the reverter being temporarily blocked from editing"