![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HIM Nguyen ( talk) 12:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
This book is currently in print and a best seller, justifying a "high importance."
Per WP:BOLD I have removed the reference to this novel being fan fiction because Wikipedia defines it as amateur works. James' work is not amateur and it most certainly does not qualify as unauthorized as Austen's works were in the public domain by the time it was written and it was adapted by the BBC as a miniseries, thereby making it legitimate. While it's possible James self-described the novel as such, as a matter of simple fact it is not. If someone wishes to dispute this, one solution would be to provide a source next to the description. 70.73.90.119 ( talk) 17:35, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HIM Nguyen ( talk) 12:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
This book is currently in print and a best seller, justifying a "high importance."
Per WP:BOLD I have removed the reference to this novel being fan fiction because Wikipedia defines it as amateur works. James' work is not amateur and it most certainly does not qualify as unauthorized as Austen's works were in the public domain by the time it was written and it was adapted by the BBC as a miniseries, thereby making it legitimate. While it's possible James self-described the novel as such, as a matter of simple fact it is not. If someone wishes to dispute this, one solution would be to provide a source next to the description. 70.73.90.119 ( talk) 17:35, 1 August 2021 (UTC)