This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Montana Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Dearborn River High Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 January 2012 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the Dearborn River High Bridge (pictured), near Augusta, Montana, is the last standing pin-connected Pratt half-deck truss bridge left in the United States? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dearborn River High Bridge.

This bridge quite evidently does not have four spans. If the truss has four sections, the correct terminology I think is 4 bays, or 4 panels, not four spans. If the bridge had four spans, there would be three intermediate piers in the middle of the river, and that does not appear to be the case. Eregli bob ( talk) 20:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Any bridge engineers around? Can that person compare the photo with the refs? PumpkinSky talk 02:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply

which is it? the first sentence talks about how the bridge is one of the last, while a later sentence says it is the last.

i'm not sure which... but perhaps either reword the statements so they're consistent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.10.193.24 ( talk) 20:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply

The lead says "of its type" without specifying pin-connected. The later sentence does specify pin-connected. That is, as I recall, the difference. We can reword it if it's too confusing. PumpkinSky talk 02:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply