"Dear White Staffers recounted to Politico" I would possibly rephrase to distinguish the account manager from the account
"has been treated differently than white staffers by the
Capitol Police"
I would amend "Staffers of color often feel that formal channels of complaint are not responsive to them for some negative experiences, such as frequent microaggressions" as I find it confusingly worded, it seems to imply that only some experiences are not being responded to which I think is different from the source
I would change "in the matter" as I don't think it's specific enough
I originally tried to find the policy source for this when I mentioned it and wasn't able to (no idea who told me this), so happy to drop this point.
Sammielh (
talk)
10:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Sammielh: I believe you're referring to
Wikipedia:Verifiability, which states that All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. While inline citations can be at the end of sentences, its also alright for them to be at the end of the paragraph. :3
F4U (
they/it)
16:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I would be inclined to add in the years for the film and tv show of Dear White People for some context
I'm not sure it's necessary, it's just a loose reference.
I would put "By the end of January 2022" as it's a new section
"Politico referred to the stories reposted by the account"
Are there any account statistics or coverage from 2023?
No secondary stats that I'm aware of, no.
References
The Earwig results come back with 29%, which is primarily due to the quotes in the article, although it does flag the phrase "code of silence" which should probably be rephrased
"Dear White Staffers recounted to Politico" I would possibly rephrase to distinguish the account manager from the account
"has been treated differently than white staffers by the
Capitol Police"
I would amend "Staffers of color often feel that formal channels of complaint are not responsive to them for some negative experiences, such as frequent microaggressions" as I find it confusingly worded, it seems to imply that only some experiences are not being responded to which I think is different from the source
I would change "in the matter" as I don't think it's specific enough
I originally tried to find the policy source for this when I mentioned it and wasn't able to (no idea who told me this), so happy to drop this point.
Sammielh (
talk)
10:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Sammielh: I believe you're referring to
Wikipedia:Verifiability, which states that All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. While inline citations can be at the end of sentences, its also alright for them to be at the end of the paragraph. :3
F4U (
they/it)
16:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I would be inclined to add in the years for the film and tv show of Dear White People for some context
I'm not sure it's necessary, it's just a loose reference.
I would put "By the end of January 2022" as it's a new section
"Politico referred to the stories reposted by the account"
Are there any account statistics or coverage from 2023?
No secondary stats that I'm aware of, no.
References
The Earwig results come back with 29%, which is primarily due to the quotes in the article, although it does flag the phrase "code of silence" which should probably be rephrased