This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cricket Low‑importance This redirect is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Cricket To-do list: history watch purge Article assessment Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details Verifiability Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards Cleanup There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format) Infoboxes Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes Cricket people Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class. Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket. Create articles for redlinks present here and here Cricket teams & countries Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe; Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams Create articles about cricket in these missing countries Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI Images Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here On this day in cricket Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries Umpires Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel Women Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours Update A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains Regularly updating cricketers' career stats. Other Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Have changed:

"The ball is hit into the field, a fielder gathers the ball, and the batsmen obviously decline to attempt to take any more runs."

to:

"The ball is finally settled in the hands of the wicket-keeper or the bowler (and the batsmen obviously decline to attempt to take any more runs)"

The name of the man who hit the roof is irrelevant and should remain as just an Australian batsamn. This is notice given that the removal of the name is being discussed and if no comments are made in 14 days then inserting the name will be removed per this discusion.-- 134.225.235.40 10:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I think the name of the batsman should be included, as should the name of the venue. It provides extra information in the same amount of space, without which the sentence sounds incredibly vague. I also disagree with the time limit on the discussion - people should not be excluded because they simply didn't happen to look at this page between 22 February and 10 March 2007. Pirsq ( talk) 16:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC) reply