De quinque corporibus regularibus has been listed as one of the
Mathematics good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 5, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from De quinque corporibus regularibus appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 18 September 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Amkgp (
talk)
10:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Created by David Eppstein ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ján Kepler ( talk · contribs) 10:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Very good written article!
If there are no free alternatives available, a user who is knowledgeable about the foreign language of the poem and confident in translating the text is encouraged to provide his or her own literal translation or a close-to-literal poetic translation. A basic verbatim translation does not violate the policies on original research (WP:OR) or synthesis (WP:SYNTH), and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines encourage users to provide accurate translations." WP:TRANSCRIPTION says the same thing more succinctly. It was easy enough to find sources for della Francesca being from Borgo, though, so I added one reused from elsewhere in the article. — David Eppstein ( talk) 08:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
-- Ján Kepler ( talk) 19:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Responding to the 20 request. I read the article and the prose looks fine to me. Ján Kepler, thanks for reviewing! This appears to be your first review and it's generally preferred to have more detailed commentary in order to provide feedback to the nominator and to show that the article has been thoroughly evaluated. Is there any improvement that you could recommend for the article? Or, if you can't think of anything that would improve the article, then perhaps elaborate a bit on why you think it meets the criteria. See here or here for examples of some recent reviews of mine. ( t · c) buidhe 07:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
De quinque corporibus regularibus has been listed as one of the
Mathematics good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 5, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from De quinque corporibus regularibus appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 18 September 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Amkgp (
talk)
10:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Created by David Eppstein ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ján Kepler ( talk · contribs) 10:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Very good written article!
If there are no free alternatives available, a user who is knowledgeable about the foreign language of the poem and confident in translating the text is encouraged to provide his or her own literal translation or a close-to-literal poetic translation. A basic verbatim translation does not violate the policies on original research (WP:OR) or synthesis (WP:SYNTH), and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines encourage users to provide accurate translations." WP:TRANSCRIPTION says the same thing more succinctly. It was easy enough to find sources for della Francesca being from Borgo, though, so I added one reused from elsewhere in the article. — David Eppstein ( talk) 08:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
-- Ján Kepler ( talk) 19:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Responding to the 20 request. I read the article and the prose looks fine to me. Ján Kepler, thanks for reviewing! This appears to be your first review and it's generally preferred to have more detailed commentary in order to provide feedback to the nominator and to show that the article has been thoroughly evaluated. Is there any improvement that you could recommend for the article? Or, if you can't think of anything that would improve the article, then perhaps elaborate a bit on why you think it meets the criteria. See here or here for examples of some recent reviews of mine. ( t · c) buidhe 07:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)