This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
De Havilland Canada DHC-4 Caribou article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Seems to be a contradiction in the first paragraph, i.e. the US Army called it the CV-2, but the US military called it the C-7. 69.225.162.92 01:04, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
According to this Caribous are in operation with Ansett MAL, but Ansett ceased all operations in September 2001. ( 203.27.52.242 ( talk) 23:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC))
Removed statement about Brazilian Air Force Caribou fleet, since Brazil never operated the type. Someone mixed up the things a little bit: Brazilian Air Force operated DHC-5 Buffalos not Caribous. RobertoRMola ( talk) 14:43, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Why no further detail? The design origins, the construction methods (was it wood, all-metal, what?), STOL features (full length flaps? Drooping ailerons?) What makes it so superb at STOL performance? Why the high wing? Maybe note the fact that the distinctive "high tail" was included to allow very high angles-of-attack on landing and take-off while avoiding tail strikes.... .45Colt 09:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
You're comparing here the DHC-4 with the C-160? Whose capacity is 16000 kg, about 3 tons more than the DHC-4's MTOW of 12927 kg? How? -- 46.114.0.198 ( talk) 22:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
De Havilland Canada DHC-4 Caribou article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Seems to be a contradiction in the first paragraph, i.e. the US Army called it the CV-2, but the US military called it the C-7. 69.225.162.92 01:04, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
According to this Caribous are in operation with Ansett MAL, but Ansett ceased all operations in September 2001. ( 203.27.52.242 ( talk) 23:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC))
Removed statement about Brazilian Air Force Caribou fleet, since Brazil never operated the type. Someone mixed up the things a little bit: Brazilian Air Force operated DHC-5 Buffalos not Caribous. RobertoRMola ( talk) 14:43, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Why no further detail? The design origins, the construction methods (was it wood, all-metal, what?), STOL features (full length flaps? Drooping ailerons?) What makes it so superb at STOL performance? Why the high wing? Maybe note the fact that the distinctive "high tail" was included to allow very high angles-of-attack on landing and take-off while avoiding tail strikes.... .45Colt 09:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
You're comparing here the DHC-4 with the C-160? Whose capacity is 16000 kg, about 3 tons more than the DHC-4's MTOW of 12927 kg? How? -- 46.114.0.198 ( talk) 22:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)