This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Literature / Ethics / Modern High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature Ethics Modern philosophy Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

"In 1624 De Cive a more formal and detailed version of the third part of his scheme. Seeing that it had little impact on England, Hobbes started writing another book that would have but a big effect on England, the turnout of that was Leviathan."

It reads like something that's been fed through an automatic translator a few times... I'm going to try to tidy it up a bit, hope that's okay. Omgplz ( talk) 13:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC) reply