The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Daybreak (1983 TV series) and Daybreak (2010 TV series). Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 08:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• Daybreak (TV-am) → Daybreak (TV-am TV programme)
• Daybreak (TV programme) → Daybreak (ITV TV programme)

– or Daybreak (1983 TV programme) and Daybreak (2010 TV programme). Daybreak (TV-am) was also a "TV programme", so the title is ambiguous. per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) it should be either of the options. © Tbhotch ^™ ( en-2.5). 22:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• Use Daybreak (1983 TV series) and Daybreak (2010 TV series) per WP:NCTV we use "year TV series" format; but keep redirects at Daybreak (ITV TV programme), Daybreak (TV-am TV programme), Daybreak (ITV TV program), Daybreak (TV-am TV program), Daybreak (ITV), Daybreak (TV-am), Daybreak (1983 TV program), Daybreak (2010 TV program), Daybreak (1983 TV programme) and Daybreak (2010 TV programme);. After this move is done, " Daybreak (TV programme)", " Daybreak (TV)", " Daybreak (TV program)", " Daybreak (TV series)", " Daybreak (UK TV series)", " Daybreak (British TV series)" should redirect to the disambiguation page. -- 70.50.151.11 ( talk) 00:59, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply
• Neutral - But oppose the move to '(ITV TV programme)' and '(TVam TV programme)', TVam was an ITV franchise, but regarded as a separate channel, but broadcast on Channel 3, of which was commonly known as ITV. If that makes sense? -- [[  axg  //  ✉ ]] 13:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply
• Support Daybreak (1983 TV series) and Daybreak (2010 TV series) per WP:NCTV. -- BDD ( talk) 17:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC) reply
• Support Daybreak (1983 TV series) and Daybreak (2010 TV series) per WP:NCTV. The years seem far enough apart that a viewer cum reader will know which is which. ENeville ( talk) 19:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.