![]() | Davolls General Store was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 30, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: rejected by
BorgQueen (
talk)
15:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Created by AdmiralAckbar1977 ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Davolls General Store; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Hi @ Nikkimaria, I see you added a maintenance tag to this article here. I don't really understand why, in my opinion a block of prose would make it hard to see the different owners over the stores history. While a list breaks it up easily. For now I'm going to follow @ Cielquiparle's advice in the DYK section above. But I would love your reasoning to why that section in particular needs to be changed. AdmiralAckbar1977 talk contribs 15:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Z1720 ( talk · contribs) 22:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I have decided to give this GAN a quick fail, mostly because lots of information that I would expect in a GAN are missing from this article. This includes: what the building was used as before its purchase in 1780, information on the architecture of the building (the facade, the inside, the grounds), its location (what municipality is it located in, and what part of that municipality, like downtown or neighbourhood name?) and its influence/legacy. I agree with the yellow banner above "Ownership history" and I think this information should be incorporated into the History section instead of having its own section. Try searching WP:LIBRARY, Google Scholar, Google News, or your local library system for more sources and information to include in this article. Some additional comments below:
If you need more help, I encourage you to use WP:PR and WP:GOCE to help improve the article, or ask for help on the talk pages of the Wikiprojects attached to this article (which you can find on the talk page). Feel free to also ping me/message me if you have any questions. Z1720 ( talk) 22:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Davolls General Store was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 30, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: rejected by
BorgQueen (
talk)
15:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Created by AdmiralAckbar1977 ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Davolls General Store; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Hi @ Nikkimaria, I see you added a maintenance tag to this article here. I don't really understand why, in my opinion a block of prose would make it hard to see the different owners over the stores history. While a list breaks it up easily. For now I'm going to follow @ Cielquiparle's advice in the DYK section above. But I would love your reasoning to why that section in particular needs to be changed. AdmiralAckbar1977 talk contribs 15:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Z1720 ( talk · contribs) 22:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I have decided to give this GAN a quick fail, mostly because lots of information that I would expect in a GAN are missing from this article. This includes: what the building was used as before its purchase in 1780, information on the architecture of the building (the facade, the inside, the grounds), its location (what municipality is it located in, and what part of that municipality, like downtown or neighbourhood name?) and its influence/legacy. I agree with the yellow banner above "Ownership history" and I think this information should be incorporated into the History section instead of having its own section. Try searching WP:LIBRARY, Google Scholar, Google News, or your local library system for more sources and information to include in this article. Some additional comments below:
If you need more help, I encourage you to use WP:PR and WP:GOCE to help improve the article, or ask for help on the talk pages of the Wikiprojects attached to this article (which you can find on the talk page). Feel free to also ping me/message me if you have any questions. Z1720 ( talk) 22:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)