A fact from Daviesia schwarzenegger appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 January 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
plants and
botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Daviesia schwarzenegger is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The
Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Thanks to Victuallers. I'm not sure the names should be capitalised though - the article is not about the actors, but Daviesia devito and D. schwarzenegger. However, I'm happy to defer to anyone more knowledgeable about DYK than I am.
Gderrin (
talk) 11:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Sure, I added an alt but its not up to me to approve it.
Victuallers (
talk) 11:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Both articles are new and neutral. There is a free image but not included the the hooks. Obviously the two articles describe two very similar plants and there is some common text but maybe enough to establish 1500 chars each. Is there an exemption from QPQ?
Victuallers (
talk) 11:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)reply
No reply. Have to assume there is an exemption based on @
Gderrin:'s archives.
Victuallers (
talk) 08:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)reply
A QPQ is needed since the nominator has more than five DYK credits, as shown
here.
DanCherek (
talk) 16:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Sorry - I've only nominated one article (Veronica perfoliata) and thought that was the criterion. I'll sort the QPQ as soon as I work out how it's done.
Gderrin (
talk) 18:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Victuallers,
DanCherek,
Gderrin, the rules recently changed so that rather than credits, DYK is counting nominations (or nominated articles) only. So despite the large number of credits, there is only the one nomination to date. After this, it will be three—I believe we're counting nominated articles rather than nominations, but I'm a bit unclear on that given how often it was updated during the recent rule change. Victuallers, can you please continue your review? Many thanks.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 23:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the clarification BlueMoonset and apologies for my mistaken comment, Gderrin.
DanCherek (
talk) 23:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Overlapping text but considered long enough as both are over 1500 chars. Refs are there including for the hook. (Alt1 needs a review due to COI). Its neutral and the hook is hooky. Sorry for the delay. Nice articles.
Victuallers (
talk) 08:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)reply
A fact from Daviesia schwarzenegger appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 January 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
plants and
botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Daviesia schwarzenegger is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The
Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Thanks to Victuallers. I'm not sure the names should be capitalised though - the article is not about the actors, but Daviesia devito and D. schwarzenegger. However, I'm happy to defer to anyone more knowledgeable about DYK than I am.
Gderrin (
talk) 11:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Sure, I added an alt but its not up to me to approve it.
Victuallers (
talk) 11:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Both articles are new and neutral. There is a free image but not included the the hooks. Obviously the two articles describe two very similar plants and there is some common text but maybe enough to establish 1500 chars each. Is there an exemption from QPQ?
Victuallers (
talk) 11:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)reply
No reply. Have to assume there is an exemption based on @
Gderrin:'s archives.
Victuallers (
talk) 08:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)reply
A QPQ is needed since the nominator has more than five DYK credits, as shown
here.
DanCherek (
talk) 16:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Sorry - I've only nominated one article (Veronica perfoliata) and thought that was the criterion. I'll sort the QPQ as soon as I work out how it's done.
Gderrin (
talk) 18:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Victuallers,
DanCherek,
Gderrin, the rules recently changed so that rather than credits, DYK is counting nominations (or nominated articles) only. So despite the large number of credits, there is only the one nomination to date. After this, it will be three—I believe we're counting nominated articles rather than nominations, but I'm a bit unclear on that given how often it was updated during the recent rule change. Victuallers, can you please continue your review? Many thanks.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 23:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the clarification BlueMoonset and apologies for my mistaken comment, Gderrin.
DanCherek (
talk) 23:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Overlapping text but considered long enough as both are over 1500 chars. Refs are there including for the hook. (Alt1 needs a review due to COI). Its neutral and the hook is hooky. Sorry for the delay. Nice articles.
Victuallers (
talk) 08:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)reply