Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Harrias talk 14:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid to say that article is a long way off Good article status. I'm not going to provide an in-depth review, as I think the overall fixes are so major that anything specific would probably be changed anyway. The main issues for me are:
Hopefully, you won't be too put off by this review; while it isn't a Good Article, it is still a good article, and with (admittedly a fair bit of) work, it can eventually become Good, the biggest problem is your lack of verifiability. Harrias talk 20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Harrias talk 14:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid to say that article is a long way off Good article status. I'm not going to provide an in-depth review, as I think the overall fixes are so major that anything specific would probably be changed anyway. The main issues for me are:
Hopefully, you won't be too put off by this review; while it isn't a Good Article, it is still a good article, and with (admittedly a fair bit of) work, it can eventually become Good, the biggest problem is your lack of verifiability. Harrias talk 20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)